Intelligent accountability in schools: A study of how school leaders work with the implementation of assessment for learning

Abstract

In response to accountability systems dominated by external inspections and achievement data, calls are being made for intelligent accountability or a new accountability paradigm that focuses on meaningful learning, enabled by professionally skilled and committed educators within the system. In such systems, the actors are encouraged to strive for continuous development in learning organisations based on teamwork, distributed leadership, and professional learning communities. School leaders are positioned between district level administrators and teachers in such processes and have the responsibility to secure professional development. Using the implementation of the national program 'Assessment for Learning' in Norway as a case, the article shows that leaders approach professional development differently. Analyses of interviews with leaders from 7 schools reveal three distinct approaches related to how school leaders perceive knowledge. Some school leaders assume that teachers have the necessary knowledge and skills and trust them to manage the implementation process without leader support. Other school leaders distrust teachers' knowledge and skills and assume that the proper knowledge exists outside the school. These leaders seek external support when they meet teacher resistance. In a third approach, school leaders assume that knowledge develops through collaboration and thereby engage with teachers in continuous judgment about the implementation procedure. In the discussion, questions of trust and distrust are analysed in relation to how professional knowledge is developed and how professional discretion can support the development of intelligent accountability in schools.

Inclusive Education in Portugal: Teachers’ Professional Development, Working Conditions, and Instructional Efficacy

“…The demands of inclusion are significant and add to the high demands of teachers' accountability for students' achievement [54][55][56]. These demands might generate high levels of stress and burnout and the inability to cope with classroom challenges [57][58][59].…”

Introducing a Model for Infrastructure Improvement to Develop Intelligent Schools

“…Intelligent school environments provide a platform for increasing student's motivation, and enable students to learn efficiently. Moreover, in intelligent schools, the teaching-learning process is not limited to the hours of students attending school and students can learn and practice curriculum concepts outside school through the use of content management systems [11]. Using application teacher, students and parents can collaborate on a single podium, while teachers can counsel students in a real-time and share interact with parents as well as administrators [25].…”

“…The use of ICT in education in intelligent schools increases student's motivation and educational achievement, in addition; it reduces student interactions and students' dependency on school [9,10]. The results of the study concerning the differences and effects of education in intelligent schools compared to traditional schools revealed that in intelligent school students' motivation, learning skills, and educational accomplishment is higher than students in traditional school [11].…”

Leadership Style and Principal Supervision in Improving Teacher Performance at State High Schools in Kutai Kartanegara Regency, East Kalimantan Province, Indonesia

“…Principals are seen as a key factor to improve school effectiveness and performance (Day et al, 2016). The role of the principal in this position is unique because it is located between the public and internal areas of the school (Tolo et al, 2020), so that the principal in carrying out his leadership function requires the support, trust, and active involvement of all components (Sebastian et al, 2019), as well as creativity in innovating and advancing schools and improving student learning outcomes (Pietsch et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2018;Heck & Hallinger, 2014).…”