2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology 2010
DOI: 10.1109/wi-iat.2010.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Agents in Mobile Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks: Leveraging Trust Modeling Based on Direct Experience with Incentives for Honesty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature [10,11] proposes a multi-tiered trust modeling framework that includes role-based trust, experience-based trust, and majority-based trust, and can limit the number of reports received. In [12], a trust-based VANETs privacy protection model was proposed.…”
Section: Trust-based Vcps Security Methods Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature [10,11] proposes a multi-tiered trust modeling framework that includes role-based trust, experience-based trust, and majority-based trust, and can limit the number of reports received. In [12], a trust-based VANETs privacy protection model was proposed.…”
Section: Trust-based Vcps Security Methods Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we assume communication through vanet technologies, aiming to be consistent with the IEEE802.11p standard. A trust model in [14] employs a penalty in case of misleading reports. Experiments with altruist/selfish agents in vanets [13] shown that average speed increased when the vehicular agents cooperate.…”
Section: B Multi-agent Vehicular Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we outline our original framework for modeling trust in VANET environments ( [1][2][3]). We consider the driver of each vehicle in our VANET environment to be represented by an agent.…”
Section: Background: Multi-faceted Trust Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical distinction of direct or indirect reporting then influences the values set for α and β, introducing greater penalties for disappointment with direct advice. In [2] we discuss at greater length the incentives to honesty that are introduced within this framework; for brevity, we omit that discussion in this paper.…”
Section: T a (B) ← T A (B) + β(1 ? T A (B))mentioning
confidence: 99%