2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent bearing faults diagnosis featuring Automated Relative Energy based Empirical Mode Decomposition and novel Cepstral Autoregressive features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then a threshold is set and all the IMFs above or below that relative energy threshold are added together to construct the pre-processed signal (Aziz et al, 2023). In our case, we have set the threshold at 3.5% and all the IMFs having relative energies above this threshold were added together to form the preprocessed signal (>3.5%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then a threshold is set and all the IMFs above or below that relative energy threshold are added together to construct the pre-processed signal (Aziz et al, 2023). In our case, we have set the threshold at 3.5% and all the IMFs having relative energies above this threshold were added together to form the preprocessed signal (>3.5%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of diagnosing abnormal equipment states based on the temperature changes of components is widely used in the fault diagnosis of wind turbines [1]. Vibration signals, lubricating oil analysis, and acoustic emission are used to detect faults in rolling bearings, large pumping station units, and motors [2][3][4][5]. However, with the rise of equipment manufacturing processes and the increase in their complexity, such methods based on the principles of the equipment itself not only need to comprehensively consider the influence of multiple relevant factors, but they also put forward high requirements for experts and their experience and analytical ability in fault diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%