Mobile Response
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75668-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Cartographic Presentations for Emergency Situations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More detailed analysis shows the use of the GIS environment [36][37][38] with recently developed methodologies to support the decision-making process in crisis management at the local level [29,39] and it is emphasized that its essential part was the visualisation of crisis progress, shown with the use of interactive, realistic, large-scale simulations [40].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More detailed analysis shows the use of the GIS environment [36][37][38] with recently developed methodologies to support the decision-making process in crisis management at the local level [29,39] and it is emphasized that its essential part was the visualisation of crisis progress, shown with the use of interactive, realistic, large-scale simulations [40].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common approaches for decluttering visual displays, such as a priori (Cai et al 2006;Jul & Furnas, 1998;Ward 2002), human operator specified (Ernst & Ostrovskii 2007, Woodruff, Landay & Stonebraker, 1998 and random (Ellis & Dix, 2006) are not appropriate for first response domains, and in particular CBRNE incidents in which every incident differs. The a priori approach cannot anticipate all information that may arise during such an event, while the random approach may remove highly relevant information and retain highly irrelevant information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%