2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1396-7_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Control for Human-Robot Cooperation in Orthopedics Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The robot performs the task respecting every constraint applied to it (R4) [26] Fuzzy+ MLP Control variables (5) Force Object handling…”
Section: Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The robot performs the task respecting every constraint applied to it (R4) [26] Fuzzy+ MLP Control variables (5) Force Object handling…”
Section: Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is clear how, in this type of interaction, the physical component is predominant. In most cases, the robot simply follows the movements of the user in the displacement of the object [26,28,46]. In more complex versions of this task, the robot, while the object is being displaced, maintains certain constraints about it.…”
Section: Collaborative Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To establish a mathematical model of the body's own laws of motion, a mathematical model based on ''minimum jerk'' and optimization theory was proposed according to the human arm kinematics model [35]. The model of human arm kinematics can be written as in (9), shown at the bottom of this page, where t denotes time of motion, a, b and c denote the undetermined coefficient.…”
Section: Human Arm Kinematics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, to realize the doctors' smooth dragging of the robot, it was necessary to determine the damping coefficient B d in the admittance control in (8). According to the experimental methods [9], set B d = 0.5N • s/mm, which was suitable for human-robot dragging in the operating room; Then the subject dragged the robot from point A to point B and repeated 5 times. Finally, in the experiment without the GVFs, the maximum offset D max = 44.94mm as shown in Fig.4 was found, and the distance difference of the experimental trajectory and the human arm kinematics model less than 40mm accounted for 97% of the total data and the distance difference less than 30mm accounted for 71%.…”
Section: Pipeline Gvfs Experiments 1) Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation