2015
DOI: 10.5566/ias.1290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Detection and Classification of Microcalcification in Compressed Mammogram Image

Abstract: The main contribution of this article is introducing an intelligent classifier to distinguish between benign and malignant areas of micro-calcification in companded mammogram image which is not proved or addressed elsewhere. This method does not require any manual processing technique for classification, thus it can be assimilated for identifying benign and malignant areas in intelligent way. Moreover it gives good classification responses for compressed mammogram image. The goal of the proposed method is twof… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To deal with said problems, it is very important to suppress the noise, to enhance the contrast between the region of interest (ROI) and background in the image [2]. Particularly in this research the image database used is of a good quality and high resolution so the finding of micro-calcification clusters (MCCs) it is not as problematic as in previous works that had worked with for example a low quality image free database as the MIAS (Mammographic Image Analysis Society) [4,5,6,7,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To deal with said problems, it is very important to suppress the noise, to enhance the contrast between the region of interest (ROI) and background in the image [2]. Particularly in this research the image database used is of a good quality and high resolution so the finding of micro-calcification clusters (MCCs) it is not as problematic as in previous works that had worked with for example a low quality image free database as the MIAS (Mammographic Image Analysis Society) [4,5,6,7,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Most recent research [7] from 2015 that used an ANN as classifier where a ROI image is classified as normal or abnormal (benign or malignant) using a Probabilistic neural network (PNN) shows that their proposed model performance is good at achieving high sensitivity of 97.27% and specificity of 94.38%.…”
Section: Previous Researchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2014, (Woods et al) introduced a pattern approach using a decentralized watershed segmentation multiagent scheme with an accuracy of 84.3% and a classification precision of 91.17% [16]. Hybrid modeling was suggested by (Joseph et al) in 2015 [17]. In 2016, (Ahmad) [18] suggested the importance of the Static Time series for segmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from the aforementioned works, other methods have been used for image segmentation, such as incorporating adaptive local information into fuzzy clustering [12], arbitrary noise models via solution of minimal surface problems [13], clustering technique optimized by cuckoo search [14], modified Gaussian mixture models incorporating local spatial information [15], conditional random field learning with convolutional neural network features [16], dynamic incorporation of wavelet filter in FCM [17,18], proliferation index evaluation [19], and fuzzy active contour model with kernel metric .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%