2018 6th International Conference on Control Engineering &Amp; Information Technology (CEIT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ceit.2018.8751857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent mixed H2/H FOPID controller optimized for radar guided missile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 8. The physical meaning of the conditions in (26) and ( 27) is that the actuator attack state Γ a (t) of dynamic smoothed model in (8) and sensor attack state Γ s (t) of dynamic smoothed model in ( 9) are all observable.…”
Section: Proof See Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 8. The physical meaning of the conditions in (26) and ( 27) is that the actuator attack state Γ a (t) of dynamic smoothed model in (8) and sensor attack state Γ s (t) of dynamic smoothed model in ( 9) are all observable.…”
Section: Proof See Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For years, various guidance laws have been utilized with different control concepts. Currently, most popular terminal guidance laws defined by Locke involve line-of-sight (LOS) guidance [6], [7], LOS rate guidance [8], [9], commandto-line-of-sight (CLOS) guidance [10], [11], and other advanced guidances such as proportional navigation guidance (PNG) [12]- [14], command to optimal interception point (COIP) guidance [15], augmented proportional navigation guidance (APNG) [16], optimal guidance law [17]- [19], linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) theory [20], [21], sliding mode theory [22], H ∞ robust theory, impact angle control [23]- [25] and fuzzy logic control theory [26]- [28], etc. For the above conventional guidance strategy designs, it assumed the information of target and missile can be obtained perfectly by the seeker of missile for guidance control design, namely it neglect the effect of measurement noise in seeker.…”
Section: Introdutctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since these extra parameters are mutually influenced by the controller's gains, tuning the parameters of the FOPID controller is much more challenging than for the classical integer-order case. To solve this problem, various optimization strategies have been applied, including particle swarm optimization [2]- [4], genetic algorithms [5], [6], differential evolution methods [5], chaotic firefly algorithms [7], extensions of classical tuning methods for PID controllers [8], [9], and other techniques [10]- [14]. Several implementations in control loops of various processes show that FOPID controllers can be effectively used, and their control performances can be much better than classical PID [14]- [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, various optimization strategies have been applied, including particle swarm optimization [2]- [4], genetic algorithms [5], [6], differential evolution methods [5], chaotic firefly algorithms [7], extensions of classical tuning methods for PID controllers [8], [9], and other techniques [10]- [14]. Several implementations in control loops of various processes show that FOPID controllers can be effectively used, and their control performances can be much better than classical PID [14]- [23]. Additionally, the FOPID controllers can also apply fractional variable-order elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%