2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent personal assistants: A systematic literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Current research on voice-assistants stress on three main aspects: (a) improving the technology empowering these devices with an aim to provide better voice recognition, ability to understand multiple languages, providing humanlike speech output, adding emotions to these devices, and likewise, (b) improving the privacy and security of these devices, so that the users can trust them in their daily usage, and (c) theoretical research focusing on the factors along with research models that explain the usage of these devices [17]. Although the indirect objective of the first research direction is to improve the usability of the voice-assistants by making them more user-friendly, yet these works focus on improving the technology, and not on the usability aspect per se.…”
Section: Current State-of-art Of Voice-assistantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current research on voice-assistants stress on three main aspects: (a) improving the technology empowering these devices with an aim to provide better voice recognition, ability to understand multiple languages, providing humanlike speech output, adding emotions to these devices, and likewise, (b) improving the privacy and security of these devices, so that the users can trust them in their daily usage, and (c) theoretical research focusing on the factors along with research models that explain the usage of these devices [17]. Although the indirect objective of the first research direction is to improve the usability of the voice-assistants by making them more user-friendly, yet these works focus on improving the technology, and not on the usability aspect per se.…”
Section: Current State-of-art Of Voice-assistantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The voice-assistants must provide guidance to the users through their interactions, so that they are not easily lost. Interaction must be short for minimizing the acoustic confusability of vocabulary (i.e., short yes/no type) studies have revealed that users consider them to be their assistive companions [2,4,17,45]. Therefore, quality of the auditory feedback is an important issue that is another uniqueness of the voice-based systems.…”
Section: Usability Dimension Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of an Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA) to improve learning is an emerging practice that, although not yet widespread, has an important future role. The implementation of IPAs through Voice User Interfaces (VUIs) (see Barcelos et al [ 16 ] for an analysis of the taxonomy of voice assistants) means that these assistants can give immediate and intuitive responses to natural language stimuli, so that the user can develop voice interaction through the computer system. In addition, many of them include the possibility of creating applications at no cost for their development and use, such as the Amazon Echo or the Google Home assistants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on assistant platforms presents a diverse picture, which is already reflected in the various definitions and notions of assistants (see [15], [16], [17]). Besides the most popular terms of virtual and personal assistants (see Table 1), similar terms are digital, intelligent and voice assistants as well as (less popular) combinations such as intelligent virtual assistants [18], intelligent personal assistants [17], personal digital assistants [19], virtual digital assistants [20] or smart personal assistants [16]. Among the main ideas of these terms are (1) the support of (human) users when (2) accessing digitally enabled services by (3) means of text, voice, and/or visual modes of input.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%