2022
DOI: 10.1007/s44196-022-00067-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Prediction of Cryptogenic Stroke Using Patent Foramen Ovale from TEE Imaging Data and Machine Learning Methods

Abstract: In spite of the popularity of random forests (RF) as an efficient machine learning algorithm, methods for constructing the potential association for between patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke (CS) using this technique are still barely. For the vital regional study areas (atrial septum), RF was used to predict CS in patients with PFO using partial clinical data of patients and remotely sensed imaging examination data obtained from Tee imaging. We validated our method on a dataset of 151 consecuti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The original data were divided into different subsets, where each subset had a prediction, and then the prediction results of the various subsets were combined as the final output of RF. Thus, the random forest method is more accurate than the results obtained by a single decision tree [38][39][40]. Since the random forest method is insensitive to the noise in the dataset, it is best for dealing with complex nonlinear relationships between features and outputs.…”
Section: Rf Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original data were divided into different subsets, where each subset had a prediction, and then the prediction results of the various subsets were combined as the final output of RF. Thus, the random forest method is more accurate than the results obtained by a single decision tree [38][39][40]. Since the random forest method is insensitive to the noise in the dataset, it is best for dealing with complex nonlinear relationships between features and outputs.…”
Section: Rf Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%