2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0957-4158(03)00044-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent ship autopilots––A historical perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical PID control is often preferred for motion control of ROVs, and likewise for industrial applications in general (Smallwood & Whitcomb, 2004;Roberts, Sutton, Zirilli, & Tiano, 2003;Hsu, Costa, Lizarralde, & da Cunha, 2000), despite the availability of several other control techniques. Although the PID control has its limitations to cope with highly coupled multivariable nonlinear and time-varying dynamics, it is often preferred due to its synthesis and implementation simplicity, apart from being fully understood and having been extensively and successfully tested in practice for almost one century since it was introduced (Åström & Hägglund, 2011;Franklin, Powell, & Emami-Naeini, 2009;Roberts et al, 2003;Friedland, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classical PID control is often preferred for motion control of ROVs, and likewise for industrial applications in general (Smallwood & Whitcomb, 2004;Roberts, Sutton, Zirilli, & Tiano, 2003;Hsu, Costa, Lizarralde, & da Cunha, 2000), despite the availability of several other control techniques. Although the PID control has its limitations to cope with highly coupled multivariable nonlinear and time-varying dynamics, it is often preferred due to its synthesis and implementation simplicity, apart from being fully understood and having been extensively and successfully tested in practice for almost one century since it was introduced (Åström & Hägglund, 2011;Franklin, Powell, & Emami-Naeini, 2009;Roberts et al, 2003;Friedland, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although the PID control has its limitations to cope with highly coupled multivariable nonlinear and time-varying dynamics, it is often preferred due to its synthesis and implementation simplicity, apart from being fully understood and having been extensively and successfully tested in practice for almost one century since it was introduced (Åström & Hägglund, 2011;Franklin, Powell, & Emami-Naeini, 2009;Roberts et al, 2003;Friedland, 1986). The performance limitations can be sought to be circumvented by combining other techniques with the basic PID algorithm, whereupon satisfactory PID-based controllers can be obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With their strong autonomy and adaptability, unmanned ships have gradually become the new research direction pursued by the current industry [3]. Unmanned ships can not only perform tasks independently in dangerous sea areas, but also cooperate with manned ships to improve work efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires that the controllers are able to act in real-time, while continuing the execution of the assigned tasks. To achieve this goal, modern ship Mechatronics behaviour-based systems make use of an effective approach to robotic and autonomous agent con-trol due to its modularity and robust real-time properties (Roberts et al 2003). -The third challenge is the realism of the behaviour of the autonomous ship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%