2020 11th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iisa50023.2020.9284365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent System for Detection of Wild Animals Using HOG and CNN in Automobile Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern approaches use deep learning techniques such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) that extract features from images, which were subsequently classified using several dense layers. There are also solutions that combine traditional features such as HoG with CNN [ 50 , 51 ]. An extensive review of the object detection techniques using deep learning is provided in [ 52 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern approaches use deep learning techniques such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) that extract features from images, which were subsequently classified using several dense layers. There are also solutions that combine traditional features such as HoG with CNN [ 50 , 51 ]. An extensive review of the object detection techniques using deep learning is provided in [ 52 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Munian et al [5] designed an intelligence technique for monitoring wild creatures in an automotive application utilizing HOG and CNN. This research adds a novel intensity to wild animal auto-detection throughout dynamic midnight periods, utilizing infrared thermal interpretation via a camera car attachment to reduce automobile and wildlife collisions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Object detection algorithms for AVs focus primarily on road signs, pedestrians, cyclists, or other vehicles [e.g., 52-58], with comparatively fewer methods designed for animal detection [59][60][61][62].…”
Section: Obstacle Detection and Motion Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high levels of morphological variation across animal species, along with a wide range of sensory perception processes, behavioral responses, and means of locomotion, introduce several obstacles to automated animal detection methods. Munian et al [59] employed thermal imaging and a convolutional neural network (CNN) with the Histogram of Oriented Gradient (HOG) transform, to reach an average accuracy of 89%. This particular method experiences limitations with coldblooded species, as it is based on thermal images, or for higher vehicle speeds, as the processing time is between 1 to 3 seconds.…”
Section: Obstacle Detection and Motion Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation