Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Why Teachers Abandoned a Technology Aimed at Automating Teaching Processes

Abstract

Expectations that technology will improve and streamline education are high. However, technology often introduces new problems. This study aims to explore the challenges mathematics teachers encounter when they implement a digital mathematics textbook with an integrated intelligent tutoring system. A formative intervention was conducted in a two-year project with 16 secondary school teachers. The method was based on activity theory and required the teachers to collaborate with researchers in analyzing their work activity when the new teaching tool was introduced. In this paper, we show that an intelligent tutoring system created systemic contradictions for the teachers. Those contradictions involved predictability, division of labor, individual versus collective learning, accountability, and expectations versus experience. The teachers all tried to resolve the contradictions, but eventually felt compelled to abandon the intelligent tutoring system. The findings contribute to a better understanding of teachers' responses to a technology aimed at automating teaching processes.

A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society

“…They conducted a formative intervention with sixteen secondary school mathematics teachers and found systemic contradictions between teachers' opinions and ITS recommendations, eventually leading to the abandonment of the tool. 1088 There are a number of ed-tech companies that are leading the AIEd revolution. New funds are also emerging to invest in ed-tech companies and to help ed-tech startups in scaling their products.…”

The challenge for the digital age: making learning a part of life

“…There is new educational designs are not only influenced by data but also by problems, ideas, visions, and inspirational prototypes. The role of the teacher is also central to realize effective use of data for guiding instruction (Utterberg Mod en et al, 2021). Teachers are responsible for teaching in their classroom and if systems are part of creating unfair or unwanted conditions they are in many cases and should be able to choose not to include the systems.…”

A review of the Development Trend of Personalized learning Technologies and its Applications

“…Intelligent Tutoring Systems use complicated algorithms to tailor their teaching methods to the strengths and limitations of each student. Individualized education is more effective than traditional group education approaches [36,37].…”