2014
DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligibility as a clinical outcome measure following intervention with children with phonologically based speech–sound disorders

Abstract: Citation: Lousada, M., Jesus, L. M., Hall, A. & Joffe, V. (2014). Intelligibility as a clinical outcome measure following intervention with children with phonologically based speechsound disorders. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12095 This is the unspecified version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(108 reference statements)
1
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though single word naming cannot measure a child's communication ability, it does imply that speech intelligibility is affected by consonant errors as reported in many studies (e.g., Lousada et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Even though single word naming cannot measure a child's communication ability, it does imply that speech intelligibility is affected by consonant errors as reported in many studies (e.g., Lousada et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To our knowledge, in Portugal there is only one published study (Lousada et al, , 2014 about intervention with children with phonologically based SSD, which seems insufficient to consider that there is evidence for clinical practice.…”
Section: From Research Evidence To Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 98%
“…A comparable four‐point scale was suggested by Lousada et al . () in a recent study to measure intelligibility of children (see also McLeod et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two independent RAs (SLP students, blinded for both study goal and participants' group assignment) coded and scored the transcriptions, according to the accuracy of repetition of the target utterance, on a four-point scale (the judgment criteria were defined in a detailed manner, to avoid subjectivity: 0 = unable to repeat the target utterance, 1 = repeats a single sound or a syllable, 2 = repeats two successive sounds or syllables, and 3 = a full and accurate repetition of the target utterance). A comparable four-point scale was suggested by Lousada et al (2014) in a recent study to measure intelligibility of children (see also McLeod et al 2012). The mean score for each participant in each practice session, and the mean group scores were calculated.…”
Section: Articulation Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%