2015
DOI: 10.1145/2746405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligibility Assessment and Speech Recognizer Word Accuracy Rate Prediction for Dysarthric Speakers in a Factor Analysis Subspace

Abstract: Automated intelligibility assessments can support speech and language therapists in determining the type of dysarthria presented by their clients. Such assessments can also help predict how well a person with dysarthria might cope with a voice interface to assistive technology. Our approach to intelligibility assessment is based on iVectors, a set of measures that capture many aspects of a person's speech, including intelligibility. The major advantage of iVectors is that they compress all acoustic information… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some works focus on the speech intelligibility of people with aphasia [23,24] or speech intelligibility in pathological voices [25,26]. Others try to identify speech disorders in children with cleft lip and palate [27] or to predict automatically some dysarthric speech evaluation metrics, such as intelligibility, severity and articulation impairment [28,29]. In addition, the recognition of speech emotions and autism spectrum disorders has also been investigated [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some works focus on the speech intelligibility of people with aphasia [23,24] or speech intelligibility in pathological voices [25,26]. Others try to identify speech disorders in children with cleft lip and palate [27] or to predict automatically some dysarthric speech evaluation metrics, such as intelligibility, severity and articulation impairment [28,29]. In addition, the recognition of speech emotions and autism spectrum disorders has also been investigated [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12], the i-vector paradigm was used as a speaker normalization and involved in a more complex classification approach, combining acoustic and articulatory features for the automatic detection of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). In [13], i-vectors were used for the representation of word segments produced by 15 dysarthric speakers resulting in some important correlations between automatically predicted and reference intelligibility measures. Finally, in [14], the authors proposed an approach based on a cosine distance between the i-vector representation of a speech production (test) and two reference i-vectors representing each normal and dysarthric speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each speaker s, xs is a 50 dimensional vector corresponding to the mean iVector extracted from each utterance from that speaker. For more information on the iVector extraction, refer to [34].…”
Section: Extended Input Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%