Clinical Care and Rehabilitation in Head and Neck Cancer 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04702-3_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligibility in Postlaryngectomy Speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultimately, we believe that the ability to evaluate the widest array of consonants will potentially provide a more beneficial means of assessment for clinical use. Yet it should be mentioned that, despite many years of information on postlaryngectomy speech accuracy, no standard method has yet emerged [45,54]. We would, however, also like to note that potential learning effects relative to the stimuli presented cannot be ruled out in relation to listener responses.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ultimately, we believe that the ability to evaluate the widest array of consonants will potentially provide a more beneficial means of assessment for clinical use. Yet it should be mentioned that, despite many years of information on postlaryngectomy speech accuracy, no standard method has yet emerged [45,54]. We would, however, also like to note that potential learning effects relative to the stimuli presented cannot be ruled out in relation to listener responses.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…), semantic or contextual factors [39], and/or aspects of word familiarity, even in simple listening paradigms [40], or the naturalness of sound sequences within target words [41]. This limitation in whole-word scoring has led some investigators to explore accuracy assessment options through use of nonsense stimuli across a variety of communication disorders [10,[42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%