1972
DOI: 10.1044/jshr.1502.340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligibility of Time-Compressed CNC Monosyllables

Abstract: The effects of time-compressed monosyllabic CNCs on the auditory discrimination performance of 96 young adults with normal hearing were studied. Five conditions of time compression, 30% through 70% in 10% steps, plus a 0% control condition were presented at four sensation levels (8, 16, 24, and 32 dB). Ear presentation and list version were counterbalanced with these factors. Results indicated that intelligibility was inversely related to time-compression ratio and directly related to sensation level. Ear and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As early as the 1950s, Fairbanks and colleagues used magnetic tape recorders with different playback speeds to perform uniform time compression and expansion of speech sounds ͑Fairbanks et al, 1954͒. Depending on the original speaking rate and the talker's gender, normal-hearing listeners could generally tolerate time-compressed and expanded speech for ratios up to two ͑Fairbanks et al., 1957;Beasley et al, 1972͒. However, elderly listeners and persons with certain central auditory processing disorders were found to have a particular difficulty in perceiving the time-compressed speech ͑Kurdziel et al., 1976;Gordon-Salant and Fitzgibbons, 1995; Using an explicit pitch-tracking method, coupled with manipulations of the input and output sampling rates, more recent digital time-scaling algorithms could uniformly time compress and expand speech without changing voice pitch ͑Malah, 1979͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As early as the 1950s, Fairbanks and colleagues used magnetic tape recorders with different playback speeds to perform uniform time compression and expansion of speech sounds ͑Fairbanks et al, 1954͒. Depending on the original speaking rate and the talker's gender, normal-hearing listeners could generally tolerate time-compressed and expanded speech for ratios up to two ͑Fairbanks et al., 1957;Beasley et al, 1972͒. However, elderly listeners and persons with certain central auditory processing disorders were found to have a particular difficulty in perceiving the time-compressed speech ͑Kurdziel et al., 1976;Gordon-Salant and Fitzgibbons, 1995; Using an explicit pitch-tracking method, coupled with manipulations of the input and output sampling rates, more recent digital time-scaling algorithms could uniformly time compress and expand speech without changing voice pitch ͑Malah, 1979͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one was developed by Beasley et al in 1972, using Northwestern University Auditory Test number 6 word lists (NU-6), which were compressed by the electro-mechanic time compression method. 3,6,7 The original stimulus was submitted to a number of compressions proportional to an area from 0% to 70%, at 10% intervals. It is worth noting that there are other methods for the modification of the speech rate: the rate can be increased or decreased by an alteration in the speaker's speech pattern (articulation pattern) or by recording alteration (analogical or digital).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-Compressed speech (see Beasley, Schwimmer & Rintelmann, 1972): listeners were asked to repeat words from the W-22 list compressed by 60 percent (TC60), presented at 50 dB SL (re/ SRT). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%