1983
DOI: 10.1515/apeiron.1983.17.2.94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligible Matter and Geometry in Aristotle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This debate, which I cannot pursue here, can be traced throughKing (1956),Solmsen (1958),Charlton ( 1970Charlton ( , 1983,Robinson (1974 ),Dancy ( 1978),Jones (1983),Graham (1987), Mariani (1988),Cook (1989),Narbonne (1993) 237-249 (in relation to Plotinus) andBemelmans (1995). Nor shall I discuss the views of modern interpreters who believe that prime matter in Aristotle is three-dimensional or otherwise characterized, e.g Sokolowski (1970…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This debate, which I cannot pursue here, can be traced throughKing (1956),Solmsen (1958),Charlton ( 1970Charlton ( , 1983,Robinson (1974 ),Dancy ( 1978),Jones (1983),Graham (1987), Mariani (1988),Cook (1989),Narbonne (1993) 237-249 (in relation to Plotinus) andBemelmans (1995). Nor shall I discuss the views of modern interpreters who believe that prime matter in Aristotle is three-dimensional or otherwise characterized, e.g Sokolowski (1970…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%