1979
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2852(79)90063-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensities of hyperfine components in saturation spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the absorbed EM field modifies the population of the lower and upper levels by pumping but is not itself altered by the absorption process. This calculation deviates from perturbative approaches commonly used to calculate the third-order susceptibility tensor when a pump and a probe beam can be distinguished [46][47][48]. Here, the role of both interfering EM fields is permutable (both pump and probe beams are identical), which gives a high symmetry to the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This means that the absorbed EM field modifies the population of the lower and upper levels by pumping but is not itself altered by the absorption process. This calculation deviates from perturbative approaches commonly used to calculate the third-order susceptibility tensor when a pump and a probe beam can be distinguished [46][47][48]. Here, the role of both interfering EM fields is permutable (both pump and probe beams are identical), which gives a high symmetry to the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The match between observed and calculated spectra in Fig. 1 will be seen to be exact in every detail, including weak crossover resonances and all intensities [17]. The fit is well conditioned, and converges strongly even if all parameters are originally set to zero.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The AC* 0 lines are usually too weak and too close to AC = 0 lines to be observed directly but fortunately in saturation spectroscopy, crossover resonances appear halfway between two resonances that share a common state (if their frequency separation is within the Doppler width) and the crossover intensities are roughly the geometrical means between those of the parent lines. 5 Figure 1 illustrates the case of an F x -F 2 doublet. The VR splitting in the v 3 = 1 state (primarily due to the constant t 224 »t 044 ) is usually orders of magnitude larger than in the ground vibrational state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%