1973
DOI: 10.3758/bf03211182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensity discrimination of tone bursts and the form of the Weber function

Abstract: Intensity discrimination functions were determined for tone bursts at four test frequencies: 250, 1,000, 4,000, and 7,000 Hz. Slopes of best-fitting lines (~l in dB SL vs I in dB SL) indicate a "near-miss" to Weber's law at all four frequencies. The use of information provided by harmonics of the stimulus is discussed; it is concluded that-at least for high-frequency tones-such cues are not the basis for the improved acuity found at higher sensation levels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
2

Year Published

1977
1977
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For monaural listening (MrrrSm), every individual listener clearly confirms the finding reported by Schacknow and Raab (1973) with respect to both the magnitudes of the Weber fractions and the slope of the Weber function (Table 1). There is a near miss to Weber's law for monaural listening, with a slope very close to .90.…”
Section: Conditions With No Interaural Cuessupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For monaural listening (MrrrSm), every individual listener clearly confirms the finding reported by Schacknow and Raab (1973) with respect to both the magnitudes of the Weber fractions and the slope of the Weber function (Table 1). There is a near miss to Weber's law for monaural listening, with a slope very close to .90.…”
Section: Conditions With No Interaural Cuessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For ready comparison with the tabulated results of Schacknow and Raab (1973) and the graphed results of Yost (1972), all of our results are presented for individual subjects and as averages over subjects in two forms. In terms of the vector diagram of Figure I, the Weber fraction, Mil in dB, is computed as 10 10g[(RR -M2)/M 2] and (I + 61)11 in dB is computed as 10 log(RR/M 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, the results of this apparently simple test have been contradictory. Schack now and Raab (1973) found the same decrease in the difference limen with increases in base intensity at 250, 1000, 4000, and 7000 Hz. The lower frequencies might be affected by distortion products, but the higher frequencies could not be.…”
Section: Frequencysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Olfaction's differential sensitivity no longer seems inferior to that of other modalities, including vision and hearing, where k is approximately 10070 (i.e., 0.10) for successively presented stimuli (Mueller, 1951;Schacknow & Raab, 1973). Unacknowledged fluctuations in the stimulus are apparently responsible for olfaction's previous reputation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%