1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02495350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensity of bands of the C≡C stretching modes in the IR spectra and conjugation in silylacetylenes

Abstract: A comparative study of the integrated extinction coefficients (A) of the C~C stretching bands in the I R spectra of acetylene derivatives Me~SiC~CR, HC~CR. and Me3CC-~CR was carried out. The resonance interactions of substituents with a triple bond are the main cause of the changes in the values of A. The total resonance effect of the Me3Si fragment involves both acceptor (d,~t-conjugation) and donor (o,r~-cot~jugation) components; d,z:-conjugation dominates in the silylacetylenes studied. The c~R ~ resonance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the Koopmans relationship is not rigorously fulfilled for ethylene derivatives as well as for substituted benzenes. 4 In this case the ene~,,y, of perturbation 8s determined using Eq. (16) characterizes the mixing of the orbitals in the radical cation rather than that of the orbitals of neutral molecules (as should be in the ease of rigorous fulfillment of the Koopmans relationship).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the Koopmans relationship is not rigorously fulfilled for ethylene derivatives as well as for substituted benzenes. 4 In this case the ene~,,y, of perturbation 8s determined using Eq. (16) characterizes the mixing of the orbitals in the radical cation rather than that of the orbitals of neutral molecules (as should be in the ease of rigorous fulfillment of the Koopmans relationship).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that ts 7 = gl + ~R +-In the case of rigorous fulfilment of relation (2), a quantumchemical calculation of radical cation M" + can be performed using wa,ce functions of the neutral molecule M. However, as was established by the example of benzene derivatives, 4 intramo[ecular resonance interactions in M and M'* appreciably differ. This means that the conjugation between the R3E and Ph groups in neutral PhER 3 compounds is characterized by the crR~ resonance parameters, whereas that in radical cations, when the negative effective charge on ~he Ph group is subsumtially decreased, is characterized by the ~R + parameters, 4 In the studies of ethylene derivatives R3ECH=CH2 we met conven6onal conditions for studying thte conjugation in R3EP~. molecules by analyzing the 1~ values: a common indicator center R.=.…”
Section: Procedures Of Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, + R values for organometallic substituents (which are arbitrarily referred to as primary) were known only for phenyl and benzyl derivatives (D = Ph, Table 1) which were extensively studied by chemical and spectral methods [1,2]. The corresponding values for other D became accessible only as a result of our studies [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] ( Table 1). Let us consider general relations holding in variation of + R for MMe 3 and CH 2 MMe 3 , depending on the nature of M and D.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We are now capable of studying donor resonance effect in derivatives with D other than Ph. This is favored by accumulation of data (though poorly analyzed) on resonance effects in radical cations Me 3 MD + · and Me 3 MCH 2 D + · [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] having a large positive charge on various D centers. We anticipated that study of such radical cations will make it possible to analyze donor effects of , and ,n conjugation (which are the main factor responsible for nongeneral character of resonance parameters of organometallic substituents) provided that acceptor effects of d, and d,n conjugation (in Me 3 SnD + · ) or *, and *,n conjugation (in Me 3 MCH 2 D + · ) are less important.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation