2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensity standardization methods in magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the indirect assessment of the microarchitecture of the salivary glands with texture analysis has been recently hypothesized to be a useful tool in the identification of the severity of RTinduced xerostomia [21,34,37,42]. Overall, predictive models employing texture analysis alongside imaging techniques have shown very promising results in the assessment of head and neck disease [17,18,34,43,44]. Therefore, interest towards artificial intelligence and its applications to imaging is steadily growing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the indirect assessment of the microarchitecture of the salivary glands with texture analysis has been recently hypothesized to be a useful tool in the identification of the severity of RTinduced xerostomia [21,34,37,42]. Overall, predictive models employing texture analysis alongside imaging techniques have shown very promising results in the assessment of head and neck disease [17,18,34,43,44]. Therefore, interest towards artificial intelligence and its applications to imaging is steadily growing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of using MRI tools with the help of artificial intelligence to differentiate functional gland tissue from adipose tissue [17,19,48] intuitively suggested the possible benefit of these advanced techniques in the characterization of the gland radiosensitivity, albeit at the cost of a more complex standardization. It is well known that the voxel intensity on CT images relates to the intrinsic physical properties of a tissue; on the contrary, the voxel intensity on MRI acquisition techniques is highly dependent on machine-specific characteristics [44]. This makes quantitative assessments with radiomics more prone to variation based on hardwarespecific settings [44,49,50] and standardization as a whole more difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, ground-truth images were N4 bias field corrected to ensure a fair comparison with the N4 bias field corrected synthetic images; N4 bias field post-processing was performed in ADMIRE v. 3.42 (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Additionally, both images were z-score normalized before metric evaluation to ensure that the analysis was independent of the scale of intensity values, as suggested in previous literature ( 48 ), therefore MSE and PSNR calculations can be interpreted as a normalized MSE and PSNR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%