2017
DOI: 10.5430/jha.v6n3p67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensive care unit organisation and nurse outcomes: A cross-sectional study of traditional and “hot-floor” structures

Abstract: Aim: To explore the relationship between the practice environment and nurse outcomes in two Intensive Care Unit (ICU) models. Background: Internationally the demand for intensive care is increasing. A large capacity multi-specialty integrated critical care service, the "hot-floor", is emerging as the preferred organisational model. Benefits include resource consolidation and improved utilisation, operational synergies, operational flexibility and demand management. A large clinical workforce with commensurate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 70 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite being the single largest workforce in the ICU system, our ability to capture the mediating influence of the nurse on patient outcomes is poor. Measuring the effect of an individual nurse is confounded by variability in ICU size, structure, design, resources and ultimately patients (Abbenbroek et al, 2017). A plethora of research has focussed on the effect of numerous physiological, diagnostic and patient-related factors as risks for morbidity and mortality.…”
Section: Measuring the Effect Of Point-of-care Practice In Icumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being the single largest workforce in the ICU system, our ability to capture the mediating influence of the nurse on patient outcomes is poor. Measuring the effect of an individual nurse is confounded by variability in ICU size, structure, design, resources and ultimately patients (Abbenbroek et al, 2017). A plethora of research has focussed on the effect of numerous physiological, diagnostic and patient-related factors as risks for morbidity and mortality.…”
Section: Measuring the Effect Of Point-of-care Practice In Icumentioning
confidence: 99%