2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensive Induction Therapy Compared With CHOP for Hepatosplenic T-cell Lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[44][45][46] A more recent individual-level meta-analysis (which represents the largest aggregation of all published studies and case reports to date: 166 patients with a diagnosis of HSTCL) compared the response rates and overall survival outcomes of 84 patients with HSTCL treated with CHOP or CHOP-like regimens (n550) or non-CHOP-based regimens, specifically those containing cytarabine, platinum, and etoposide (n534). 35 Non-CHOP-based regimens were associated with an overall response rate of 82% compared with 52% for CHOP or CHOP-like regimens (P5.006), and median survival was 37 and 18 months, respectively (P5.00014). Use of non-CHOP-based regimens was a significant predictor of higher response rate (P5.049) and improved survival (P5.026).…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[44][45][46] A more recent individual-level meta-analysis (which represents the largest aggregation of all published studies and case reports to date: 166 patients with a diagnosis of HSTCL) compared the response rates and overall survival outcomes of 84 patients with HSTCL treated with CHOP or CHOP-like regimens (n550) or non-CHOP-based regimens, specifically those containing cytarabine, platinum, and etoposide (n534). 35 Non-CHOP-based regimens were associated with an overall response rate of 82% compared with 52% for CHOP or CHOP-like regimens (P5.006), and median survival was 37 and 18 months, respectively (P5.00014). Use of non-CHOP-based regimens was a significant predictor of higher response rate (P5.049) and improved survival (P5.026).…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…More intensive non-CHOP-based chemotherapy regimens, such as ICE (ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide) or IVAC (ifosfamide/ etoposide/cytarabine) have been associated with potentially improved outcomes. [32][33][34][35] Purine analogs (pentostatin or cladribine) either as monotherapy or in combination with alemtuzumab have also demonstrated modest activity. [36][37][38][39][40][41] Few studies have reported improved survival outcomes with autologous or allogeneic HCT as consolidation therapy for patients with disease in first or second remission.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations