Intensive Interaction and discourses of personhood: A focus group study with dementia caregivers

Abstract

Introduction Societal discourses of dementia are medicalised and dehumanising. This leads to a social problem: the loss of personhood in dementia care. The communication technique Intensive Interaction, however, honours personhood. The current study aimed to explore how paid caregivers of people with dementia enact societal discourses of dementia, with and without the context of Intensive Interaction. This was to explore ways to address the loss of personhood in dementia care. Method Paid caregivers from two residential care homes attended an Intensive Interaction training day. Caregivers participated in focus groups before and after training. Transcripts of the focus groups were analysed with Critical Discourse Analysis, an approach which relates discourse to social power. Results Before Intensive Interaction training, carers accessed medical discourses of loss, non-communication and lack of personhood. ‘Being with’ people with dementia was framed as separate to paid work. After training, caregivers accessed discourses of communication and personhood. Intensive Interaction reframed ‘being with’ people with dementia as part of ‘doing work’. Family caregivers were largely absent from discourses. Care home hierarchies and the industrialisation of care were barriers towards honouring personhood. Conclusions Medical discourses of dementia reinforce a status quo whereby interpersonal interactions are devalued in dementia care, and professional ‘knowledge’ (thereby professional power) is privileged over relationships. Intensive Interaction may enable paid caregivers to access person-centred discourses and related practices. However, this requires support from management, organisational structures, and wider society. More research is needed to identify ways to involve families in residential care and to explore the effects of using Intensive Interaction in practice.

Interventions promoting family involvement with care homes following placement of a relative with dementia: A systematic review

“…More research is needed that involves new and enhanced interventions, specifically designed to concentrate on ways to involve families within care homes ( Heap and Wolverson, 2020 ) and deliver positive outcomes for both families and residents living with dementia. Many of Gaugler’s (2005) recommendations have yet to be addressed and multifaceted types of family involvement need to be included in future studies.…”

Family involvement with care homes following placement of a relative living with dementia: a review

“…More research is needed that involves new and enhanced interventions, specifically designed to concentrate on ways to involve families within care homes (Heap and Wolverson, 2020) and deliver positive outcomes for both families and residents living with dementia. Many of Gaugler's (2005) recommendations have yet to be addressed and multi-faceted types of family involvement need to be included in future studies.…”

Can a translational science approach change the dementia narrative in medical education?

“…The onerous vicissitudes of research and high demands of clinical care can, at times, inadvertently create a myopic medicalized lens focused on pathology, rather than the person (Heap and Wolverson, 2020 ). University curricula is an opportunity to address age-related biases and misconceptions to positively impact health equality (Scott et al, 2019 ), and elucidate preserved capacities, such as emotions (Lee et al, 2019 ) and implicit memory (Sabat, 2006 ).…”