2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40429-020-00329-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensive Longitudinal Methods for Studying the Role of Self-Regulation Strategies in Substance Use Behavior Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the promise of the present findings and their implications for smoking cessation treatment, there are some limitations that are worth mentioning. First, although daily diary measures are a valid and often preferred method to capture daily substance use behaviors in vivo (Roos et al, 2020), our main outcome measure (cigarettes smoked per day) was nonetheless estimated from self-report. Future studies can and should incorporate additional validation of smoking (e.g., via carbon monoxide or urine cotinine measures)-which is now our practice as well (Kober, Brewer, Height, & Sinha, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the promise of the present findings and their implications for smoking cessation treatment, there are some limitations that are worth mentioning. First, although daily diary measures are a valid and often preferred method to capture daily substance use behaviors in vivo (Roos et al, 2020), our main outcome measure (cigarettes smoked per day) was nonetheless estimated from self-report. Future studies can and should incorporate additional validation of smoking (e.g., via carbon monoxide or urine cotinine measures)-which is now our practice as well (Kober, Brewer, Height, & Sinha, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included both strategies to test whether they would be equally or differentially effective. Across both studies, participants completed ROC-T via computer in the lab, and we measured their post-intervention craving and smoking behaviors with daily diary surveys, an ecologically-valid and increasingly common way to assess longitudinal changes in substance use behaviors (Roos, Kober, Trull, MacLean, & Mun, 2020), as well as follow-up telephone interviews. Two primary hypotheses were tested in both studies, building on previous studies of the efficacy of cognitive strategies in attenuating craving (e.g., Kober et al, 2010a;2010b;Lopez et al, 2015;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived effectiveness may be examined by directly asking participants whether a given strategy helped or changed how they felt (e.g., Daniel et al, 2019) or may be deduced from negative affect ratings following emotion-regulation efforts (e.g., King et al, 2018). Alternatively, identifying strategy effectiveness may be tied to specific events or outcomes also measured via EMA, such as physical health symptoms (e.g., Massey et al, 2009) or alcohol/substance use (e.g., Roos et al, 2020). Furthermore, given the ability to ask a range of questions within one set of momentary surveys, multiple components of the emotion-regulation process may be examined simultaneously using this method; indeed, several studies have included inquiries about both strategy use and effectiveness (e.g., Daniel et al, 2019;Lennarz et al, 2019) or context and strategy use (e.g., Stone et al, 2019).…”
Section: Implementation Effectiveness and Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We build upon existing research describing the use of crowdsourcing recruitment by demonstrating how the Prolific platform can be leveraged for brief longitudinal data collection. Intensive longitudinal designs increasingly are used in research on substance use course, mechanisms, and assessment (e.g., Carpenter et al, 2019;Roos et al, 2020;Weiss et al, 2017), but with some exceptions (e.g., Strickland & Stoops, 2018;, prior studies using crowdsourcing platforms have relied heavily on cross-sectional designs. Furthermore, prior reviews and studies describing the use of crowdsourcing methods for substance use research have focused primarily on AMT (e.g., Arditte et al, 2020;Mellis & Bickel, 2020;Schick et al, 2019), such that demonstrating the utility of other platforms such as Prolific is useful for making researchers aware of the strengths and limitations of other available options.…”
Section: Recommendations For Repeated Assessment and Psychometric Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%