1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00622.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intent to leave and absenteeism as reactions to perceived inequity: The role of psychological and social constraints

Abstract: This study shows that (1) the perception of inequity is related to intentions to withdraw, i,e, the intent to report sick and the intent to leave, and to actual absence behaviour; (2) deprived employees were less likely to leave the organization when they felt involved in their jobs; (3) deprived employees who perceived an intolerant group absence norm were less apt to report sick.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In regard to distributive justice, teachers will perceive poor justice in their school when they experience a negative balance between their contributions to the school and the rewards they receive (Robinson and Rousseau, 1994;Van Yperen et al, 1996). In this case teachers will reduce their efforts to align their inputs with organizational rewards.…”
Section: Organizational Justice and Absenteeismmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In regard to distributive justice, teachers will perceive poor justice in their school when they experience a negative balance between their contributions to the school and the rewards they receive (Robinson and Rousseau, 1994;Van Yperen et al, 1996). In this case teachers will reduce their efforts to align their inputs with organizational rewards.…”
Section: Organizational Justice and Absenteeismmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Building further on this reasoning, Smit's absenteeism model (1997) also assumes that it will depend on the absence threshold regarding illegitimate reasons to call in sick (i.e., absence tolerance) of the individual whether he or she will actually decide to be absent (Veerman, 1993). A number of studies have indicated that employees' normative expectations about to which extent one should tolerate different reasons for being absent clearly are related to individual and group absence levels (Bamberger & Biron, 2007;Gale, 1993;Geurts et al, 1991;Haccoun & Jeanrie, 1995;Van Yperen, Hagedoorn, & Geurts, 1994). In these studies, employees with a tolerant attitude toward reasons to call in sick were more absent compared to employees with more stringent views about when one is allowed to be absent.…”
Section: Absence Tolerance and Absenteeismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die werkgewer se verantwoordelikheid berus in die skep van 'n werkomgewing wat bevorderlik is vir goeie bywoning. Werknemers is minder geneig om die organisasie te verlaat wanneer hulle meer betrokke voel in hul werk en dus oor die nodige lojaliteit beskik (Van Yperen, Hagedoorn & Geurts, 1996). Daar moet dus 'n gevoel van waarde geskep word waarin die werknemer voel dat sy/haar bydrae benodig word deur die organisasie.…”
Section: Verlofveranderlikesunclassified