2021
DOI: 10.1111/papq.12365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intention as Belief

Abstract: What's the relationship between (1) intending to do something, (2) believing that you are going to do this, and (3) its being the case that you are going to do the thing in question? I propose a position on which all three categories, correctly understood, amount in the fundamental case to the very same thing. The belief that constitutes future-directed intention, when strong, likewise constitutes one as having a real tendency to act in the intended way.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…My aim is to take issue with the lines of argument just sketched and establish the superiority of the Hope View as an alternative way to understand the mental aspect of difficult action. Those who argue that we should solve the puzzle of difficult action by rejecting the Evidence Claim hold that you can reach the belief that you will φ directly via practical reasoning, and that such a belief should therefore not be appraised in light of the evidentialist standards of 'theoretical reasoning' (see Marušić 2012Marušić , 2015Marušić and Schwenkler 2018;Schwenkler 2022;Marušić and Schwenkler 2022). Because it is not subject to the canons of theoretical rationality, but instead to those of practical rationality, the belief that you will φ should be seen as rational when held directly in response to the practical considerations supporting your decision, as opposed to held in 6 See in particular Marušić (2012Marušić ( , 2015; Marušić and Schwenkler (2018); Schwenkler (2022); Marušić and Schwenkler (2022) for a defense of the Seriousness Claim along the lines to be developed in the rest of this paragraph.…”
Section: The Phenomenon Of Difficult Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…My aim is to take issue with the lines of argument just sketched and establish the superiority of the Hope View as an alternative way to understand the mental aspect of difficult action. Those who argue that we should solve the puzzle of difficult action by rejecting the Evidence Claim hold that you can reach the belief that you will φ directly via practical reasoning, and that such a belief should therefore not be appraised in light of the evidentialist standards of 'theoretical reasoning' (see Marušić 2012Marušić , 2015Marušić and Schwenkler 2018;Schwenkler 2022;Marušić and Schwenkler 2022). Because it is not subject to the canons of theoretical rationality, but instead to those of practical rationality, the belief that you will φ should be seen as rational when held directly in response to the practical considerations supporting your decision, as opposed to held in 6 See in particular Marušić (2012Marušić ( , 2015; Marušić and Schwenkler (2018); Schwenkler (2022); Marušić and Schwenkler (2022) for a defense of the Seriousness Claim along the lines to be developed in the rest of this paragraph.…”
Section: The Phenomenon Of Difficult Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sartrean Pragmatists insist that belief's characteristic effects include 'planning for p, asserting p, and acting as if p' (Marušić 2012, 6;2015, 33-35;Marušić and Schwenkler 2018, 316-321;Schwenkler 2022, Section 2). They then note that those who have decided to φ in cases of difficult action typically manifest the behavioural dispositions associated with the belief that they will φ (Marušić 2012, 6):…”
Section: Acting Like Someone Seriously Committed To φ-Ing Does Not En...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation