2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2017.7995935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intention estimation for ramp merging control in autonomous driving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…improvement in performance can be gained when the planning algorithm has access to information about the driver internal state in lane changing scenarios. Previous work address the problem of modeling interactions between traffic participants using data-driven approaches, probabilistic models, inverse reinforcement learning, rule-based methods, or game theoretic frameworks [2], [4], [5], [8], [9]. Inverse reinforcement learning techniques and game theoretic frameworks are generally too computationally expensive to be used in an online planning algorithm considering more than two traffic participants [5], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…improvement in performance can be gained when the planning algorithm has access to information about the driver internal state in lane changing scenarios. Previous work address the problem of modeling interactions between traffic participants using data-driven approaches, probabilistic models, inverse reinforcement learning, rule-based methods, or game theoretic frameworks [2], [4], [5], [8], [9]. Inverse reinforcement learning techniques and game theoretic frameworks are generally too computationally expensive to be used in an online planning algorithm considering more than two traffic participants [5], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, our goal is the recognition of driving intention and the prediction of driving behaviors on the highway. Different methodologies have been proposed to predict driving behaviors on the intersection [1]- [4], ramp [5]- [7], and highway [8]- [10]. Transition of driving behavior on the intersection is represented by FSM and the future driving behavior is predicted in [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the advancement on algorithmic aspect of autonomous driving, these competitions also lead to the advancement on sensor side, with development of multi-beam lidar sensors such as the Velodyne range of devices [4] conceived and prototyped during the Grand Challenge [5]. Since then, a significant amount of research has been carried out addressing different aspects of autonomous driving such as object detection [6,7], localisation [8], tracking [9], intention estimation [10], as well as end-to-end deep-learning based approaches (e.g., [11]). In addition to the research explicitly addressing autonomous driving, a lot of closely-related research has also been carried out in the area of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS); for example, Martinez et al [12] investigated approaches for driving style recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%