2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intention modeling and inference for autonomous collision avoidance at sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most convenient way is assuming that the speed and course of TS are constant and the future position is estimated following the physical laws [15]. However, this assumption is unrealistic since the TS might also be aware of collision and may change their course during the OS encounter [16]. It is more crucial in confined waterways since a small error in estimating the TS trajectory could result in a collision [8].…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most convenient way is assuming that the speed and course of TS are constant and the future position is estimated following the physical laws [15]. However, this assumption is unrealistic since the TS might also be aware of collision and may change their course during the OS encounter [16]. It is more crucial in confined waterways since a small error in estimating the TS trajectory could result in a collision [8].…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article [8] proposes a parallelized implementation of the PSB-MPC on a Graphical Processing Unit (GPU) that reduces the computational speed of the algorithm, allowing the MPC problem to scale linearly with increasing the number of control behaviors, static and dynamic obstacles and prediction scenarios. In [9], the authors suggest a Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) to model and infer the intentions of other ships. Similarly, [10], proposes two-stage trajectory prediction (2-STP) algorithm to help the own ship to be aware of intention changes of target vessels and avoid collision risks.…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang et al [31] proposed a decision model based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL) and considering the attention distribution mechanism of ship pilots, in which assessment of collision risk and planning of ship movement was mainly considered. Rothmund et al [32] proposed a method using dynamic Bayesian networks to infer the intention of collision-avoidance actions of other ships in open waters, further improving the safety of results. Song et al [33] proposed an integrated classification model based on supervised learning for ship collision-avoidance course prediction, aiming to simulate the human collision-avoidance decision-making process to predict the CA steering direction of ship operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%