Intention to move in renovated historical blocks in China

Wen, Jiang; Feng, Tao; Timmermans, Harry; Li, Heping

doi:10.1007/s10901-018-9608-3

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Empirical evidence from this study clearly shows residents' high level of satisfactions towards the neighbourhood environment, interaction and attachment are significantly associated with an intention to stay on in the neighbourhood. The study finding is consistent with previous studies which indicate residents' satisfaction with the neighbourhood attributes is closely linked with lesser mobility intentions (Jiang, Feng, Timmermans, & Li, 2019). It is noted that the residents' decision to move out of the neighbourhood is an outcome of dissatisfaction with housing and neighbourhood environment concerning residents' future residential needs and preferences.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Hence, residential satisfaction is a key parameter in determining residential mobility (Boschman, 2018;Jiang, Feng, Timmermans, & Li, 2019;Speare, 1974). Unlike previous studies which have focused mainly on determinants of residential satisfaction based on neighbourhood assessments of various physical and social setting (Aulia & Ismail, 2013, 2016Tan, 2016) this study aims to extend the notion of residential satisfaction by establishing linkages between attributes of neighbourhood quality and residential mobility behaviours, with a special focus on Penang Island.…”

Section: Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Residential Satisfaction On Neighbourhood: Residential Mobility In Malaysia

Ali¹,

Badarulzaman²,

Fattah³

2019

The European Proceedings of Multidisciplinary Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Residential mobility refers to adjustments of housing needs made by households in response to changes in family life cycle phases. Households may express dissatisfaction with current housing and neighbourhood environment, relative to their desired needs, characteristics and preferences. Residential mobility involves the actual moving thus implying changes in the neighbourhood composition and structure as the current residents may decide to move out or stay on, while the new residents may move in the neighbourhood. An assessment of the neighbourhood setting can capture residents' views and perceptions of the neighbourhood environment, be it satisfactory or otherwise; and subsequently, residents may decide whether to move out or stay on in the neighbourhood. The paper aims to establish linkages between residents' perceptions of the neighbourhood environment and residential mobility behaviour. Primary data were collected via a questionnaire survey of 589 households in selected neighbourhoods in Penang, Malaysia. Study results show that attributes of neighbourhood environment, neighbourhood interaction and neighbourhood attachment are significantly associated with residential mobility. Residents who expressed satisfaction with their neighbourhood are more likely to stay on, and vice versa. Hence, future housing policy in the country should take into consideration residential mobility behaviours to enhance the neighbourhood quality for the benefits of all residents.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Residential Satisfaction On Neighbourhood: Residential Mobility In Malaysia

Ali¹,

Badarulzaman²,

Fattah³

2019

The European Proceedings of Multidisciplinary Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In fact, social space is an important factor that cannot be ignored in the process of housing choice [22]. To some extent, choices of housing location can be regarded as their choice of social environment [26,27]. Residents tend to choose to live close to people with similar social attributes as their places of residence [28].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For areas with poor social environment, residents mostly adopt an evasive attitude [25]. To some extent, residential location choice can be regarded as the residents' choice of their social environment [26,27]. Residents tend to choose a neighborhood with similar social attributes to themselves (such as life background, occupation, economic level, educational level, social status, cultural level and ethnic characteristics) as their residence [28], and their neighborhood satisfaction is influenced by social environment characteristics [29].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship between Urban Floating Population Distribution and Livability Environment: Evidence from Guangzhou’s Urban District, China

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The livability environment is an important aspect of urban sustainable development. The floating population refers to people without local hukou (also called ‘non-hukou migrants’). The floating population distribution is influenced by livability environment, but few studies have investigated this relationship. Especially, the influence of social environment on floating population distribution is rarely studied. Therefore, we study 1054 communities in Guangzhou’s urban district to explore the relationship between livability environment and floating population distribution. The purpose of this article is to study how livability environment affects floating population distribution. We develop a conceptual framework of livability environment, which consists of physical environment, social environment and life convenience. A cross-sectional dataset of the impact of livability environment on the floating population distribution is developed covering the proportion of floating population in the community as the dependent variable, eight factors of livability environment as the explanatory variables, and two factors of architectural characteristics and one factor of location characteristics as the control variables. We use spatial regression models to explore the degree of influence and direction of physical environment, social environment and life convenience on the floating population distribution in livability environment. The results show that the spatial error model is more effective than ordinary least squares and spatial lag model models. The five factors of the livability environment have statistical significance regarding floating population distribution, including four social environment factors (proportion of middle- and high-class occupation population, proportion of highly educated people in the population, proportion of rental households, and unemployment rate) and regarding life convenience factors (work and shopping convenience). The conclusion has value for understanding how the social environment affects the residential choice of the floating population. This study will help city administrators reasonably guide the residential pattern of the floating population and formulate reasonable management policies, thereby improving the city’s livability, attractiveness and sustainable development.

show abstract

“…Interestingly, the coefficients obtained for satisfaction with the historical atmosphere and satisfaction with the economy were positive, contrary to expectations. However, it is important to note that no significant relationship was found between the latter four variables (neighbourhood satisfaction, job satisfaction, satisfaction with historical atmosphere, and satisfaction with the economy) and the desire to move (Jiang et al, 2019). Despite an increasing number of Chinese studies attempting to identify determinants of residential mobility, few researchers have explored the relationship between residential satisfaction and residential mobility (Jiang et al, 2017).…”

Section: Livability and Behavioural Intentionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Urban Livability Lead to Place Attachment and Behavioural Intentions? Case Study: Isfahan City

Fu,

Adejoke,

Salaripour

et al. 2024

Environment and Urbanization ASIA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urban livability plays a crucial role in fostering place attachment and behavioural intentions. This study aims to investigate the relationships between livability, place attachment, and behavioural intentions among the citizens of Isfahan City. The data collected through Likert scale questions was analysed using structural equation modelling (SEM). The results confirmed the multi-dimensionality of urban livability, encompassing six dimensions: urban security, convenience of public facilities, natural environment, socio-cultural environment, convenient transportation, and environmental health. Additionally, the SEM results revealed that place attachment mediates the effects of the six dimensions of urban livability on neighbourhood care: intention to stay, intention to support, and intention to recommend. Therefore, evaluating citizens’ perceptions can assist local governments in formulating appropriate policies to promote urban livability.

show abstract

Intention to move in renovated historical blocks in China

Cited by 5 publications

References 45 publications

Residential Satisfaction On Neighbourhood: Residential Mobility In Malaysia

Residential Satisfaction On Neighbourhood: Residential Mobility In Malaysia

Relationship between Urban Floating Population Distribution and Livability Environment: Evidence from Guangzhou’s Urban District, China

Does Urban Livability Lead to Place Attachment and Behavioural Intentions? Case Study: Isfahan City

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About