Intentionality

Amerini, Fabrizio

doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_245

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Intentionality is a key composite of design, or in other words, design can be seen as the expression of intentionality and an intentional act (Crilly, 2011b;Dennett, 1989;Fodor, 1996). Intentionality is thought, mental states and mental drive towards assembling information and adjusting behaviour in a way that is aligned with underlying goals, desires, needs and motivations (Pierre, 2019). It is the direction of consciousness, it is what makes humans human, the sense of 'self ' and ego (Levy, 2016) and the stream of experience within human cognition and behaviour that controls and enables creativity (Klausen, 2010).…”

Section: Empathy Deviant Thinking and Intentionality -Flipping Sidesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socio-emotional Experience in Human Technology Interaction Design – A Fashion Framework Proposal

Rousi

Alanen

2021

Culture and Computing. Design Thinking and Cultural Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technology designers and developers can be understood as social experience (SE) mediators. In user experience (UX), notions of SE have served to identify and define the factors contributing to human-technology interaction (HTI). Three dominant perspectives have been promoted in UX discourse: 1) SE of brand, brand value and consumer culture; 2) technology design as mediator of human-to-human interactions; and 3) meaning generation through action and interaction between actors. Symbolic interactionalism understands meaning as occurring through dialogue, in the construction of the social self, promoting selfreflection as a social construction. This theorisation of social experience is valuable in the context of HTI as it allows for greater insight into the immaterial dimensions of technology integration in human societies. The purpose of this paper is to break down the factors contributing to social emotional experience of technology through illustrating how it operates according to fashion -temporality and spatiality in culture. This is a theoretical paper that presents a review of social experience, social emotional and collective emotion based literature in light of fashion and design. The result is a presentation of a proposed fashion framework of social emotions in technology interaction design (FASHEM). Based on symbolic interactionism, FASHEM helps break down emotional technology experience into a matrix of self, other, design semiotic interactions.

show abstract