2016
DOI: 10.1177/0894845316635821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intentions to Be an Athletic Director

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate senior athletic administrators' expectations and intentions of becoming National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletic directors (ADs) and explore women and racial minority senior athletic administrators' athletic workplace experience. To serve the purpose, two studies using social cognitive career theory (SCCT) were employed. First, demographic (i.e., gender and race) differences by SCCT variables were assessed through survey collection and multivaria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, White men continue to dominate in the space of college athletic departments. Wells and Kerwin (2017) found that women and racial minority senior athletic administrators had similar self-efficacy compared with White men, but they encountered more barriers, unfavorable outcome expectations, and lower choice goals associated with becoming an AD. To change the perceptions of women and minority men in sport leadership, there needs to be a change in discourse around perceptions of successful leaders (Knoppers & Anthonissen, 2001).…”
Section: Collegiate Sport Administrationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, White men continue to dominate in the space of college athletic departments. Wells and Kerwin (2017) found that women and racial minority senior athletic administrators had similar self-efficacy compared with White men, but they encountered more barriers, unfavorable outcome expectations, and lower choice goals associated with becoming an AD. To change the perceptions of women and minority men in sport leadership, there needs to be a change in discourse around perceptions of successful leaders (Knoppers & Anthonissen, 2001).…”
Section: Collegiate Sport Administrationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Scholarship has examined intersectionality as it relates to a variety of leadership positions within college athletic departments. Wells and Kerwin (2017) identified that women and racial minority athletic administrators face more barriers than their White male counterparts in college athletics. In addition, LaVoi's (2016) Ecological-Intersectional model, which situates intersectionality at the heart model, has been used extensively to describe the experiences of female coaches.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our social identities not only impact how individuals navigate our unique social world, but how they navigate the workplace and professional domains (Cunningham, 2019). Thus, disparate organizational treatment based on race and gender are often reflective of pathological biases embedded in society (Wells and Kerwin, 2017). In order to grapple with why issues of racism and sexism remain in college sport organizations, we must understand its history, which is rooted in Whiteness and maleness (Fink et al, 2001;Hextrum, 2020).…”
Section: Research On Barriers and Reasons For Racial And Gender Inequmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This level of sexism is a vivid depiction of organizational biases fueling sport scholars to claim that sexism and gender inequity in sport is not a coincidence, but rather institutionalized (Cunningham, 2008;Walker and Sartore-Baldwin, 2013;Fink, 2016). Prominent barriers impacting women in college sport leadership are issues of gender stereotyping particularly the assumption of being detrimentally motherly and emotional (Bower et al, 2015), lacking experienceoverseeing football and men's basketball programs and operations (Yiamouyiannis and Osborne, 2012;Taylor and Hardin, 2016), and a dearth of female mentorship (Taylor and Hardin, 2016;Wells and Kerwin, 2017).…”
Section: Barriers Facing Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous researchers (Inglis et al, 2000 ; Hoeber and Frisby, 2001 ; Shaw and Hoeber, 2003 ; Shaw and Frisby, 2006 ; Hums and Yiamouyiannis, 2007 ; Moore et al, 2010 ; Burton et al, 2011 ; Masteralexis et al, 2011 ; Burton, 2015 ; Hancock and Hums, 2016 ; Wells and Kerwin, 2016 ; Burton and Leberman, 2017 ; Hartzell and Dixon, 2018 ; Darvin et al, 2019 ) have investigated the experience of female leaders at the coaching and administrative levels of sport, and have consistently found female representation to be low. With the notable exception of a few scholars (see Leberman and Palmer, 2009 ; Shaw and Leberman, 2015 ; Aman et al, 2018 ), limited to no researchers have explored the issue within Canada where many professional teams and leagues do not have a single woman in a senior leadership role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%