2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.02.029
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter- and intra-annual dynamics of photosynthesis differ between forest floor vegetation and tree canopy in a subarctic Scots pine stand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tillers for water potential measurement were equilibrated in double bags in the dark for 25 min after sampling. N = 10 air temperature, influence consistency between measurements [3,18,25]. Instantaneous point measurements under set controlled cuvette conditions generally require a long time for leaves to acclimate to the new conditions within the leaf cuvette [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tillers for water potential measurement were equilibrated in double bags in the dark for 25 min after sampling. N = 10 air temperature, influence consistency between measurements [3,18,25]. Instantaneous point measurements under set controlled cuvette conditions generally require a long time for leaves to acclimate to the new conditions within the leaf cuvette [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the analyses by Kulmala et al (2019) and Matkala et al (2020) on subarctic Scots pine and Norway spruce stands at the northern timberline in Finland serve as examples of the canopy scale dynamics, showing that these ecosystems are generally weak carbon sinks but have a clear annual variation. Kulmala et al (2019) observed that there is a difference between tree canopy photosynthesis compared to forest floor photosynthesis which starts to increase after the snowmelt. Thus the models for photosynthesis should also address the snow cover period in order to better capture the seasonal dynamics of photosynthesis of the Northern forests says Kulmala et al (2019).…”
Section: High-latitude Photosynthetic Productivitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Kulmala et al (2019) observed that there is a difference between tree canopy photosynthesis compared to forest floor photosynthesis which starts to increase after the snowmelt. Thus the models for photosynthesis should also address the snow cover period in order to better capture the seasonal dynamics of photosynthesis of the Northern forests says Kulmala et al (2019).…”
Section: High-latitude Photosynthetic Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we defined that the stands carry 2.5 and 5.5 needle age classes in southern and northern Finland, respectively, which is based on observations from Finland (Korhonen et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013;Ťupek et al, 2015). A maximum stand needle biomass of 5000 kg ha -1 , which is representative for southern and middle Finland (Ilvesniemi and Liu, 2001), was used for southern Finland, while 3500 kg ha -1 , which is representative for a relatively poor site in Lapland (Kulmala et al, 2019), was used for northern Finland. We utilised this foliage mass value for northern Finland, as the calculation results of northern Finland should serve https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2019-502 Preprint.…”
Section: Yearly Development Of Scots Pine Needle Massmentioning
confidence: 99%