2017
DOI: 10.7341/20171312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter- and intra-firm learning synergy through integrating absorptive capacity and employee suggestion processes: The case study of Frauenthal Automotive Toruń company

Abstract: The aim of the paper is to study relationships between the processes of absorptive capacity (inter-firm learning) and learning lessons through employee suggestions (intra-firm learning) and identify potential synergies between them. The research interest is focused on investigating the following problems: (1) How do organizations apply external knowledge to support intra-organizational learning processes? (2) How should the employee suggestion system be organized to increase (or build) absorptive capacity?The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 1, the criterion framework for the evaluation of enterprise learning performance in the process of cooperative innovation includes learning process performance and learning outcomes performance, in which learning process performance is the learning outcomes of enterprises in cooperation, and learning outcomes performance is the core goal of enterprise core competence development [4,[13][14][15]. Learning process performance includes learning content, learning management, learning objectives, and learning processes, which affect the choice of learning methods and the formulation of learning mechanism in the process of cooperative innovation [6][7][8][14][15][16][17]. Learning outcomes performance includes knowledge accumulation, ability accumulation, and performance creation [6][7][8].…”
Section: Criteria Framework For the Evaluation Of Enterprise Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figure 1, the criterion framework for the evaluation of enterprise learning performance in the process of cooperative innovation includes learning process performance and learning outcomes performance, in which learning process performance is the learning outcomes of enterprises in cooperation, and learning outcomes performance is the core goal of enterprise core competence development [4,[13][14][15]. Learning process performance includes learning content, learning management, learning objectives, and learning processes, which affect the choice of learning methods and the formulation of learning mechanism in the process of cooperative innovation [6][7][8][14][15][16][17]. Learning outcomes performance includes knowledge accumulation, ability accumulation, and performance creation [6][7][8].…”
Section: Criteria Framework For the Evaluation Of Enterprise Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to say, technological progress could be achieved through internal knowledge acquisition and transformation, and internal management process could be optimized, which help to enhance external cooperative management capability. Learning process performance not only directly affects the internal learning outcomes of enterprises but also indirectly affects the external learning outcomes, thus affecting the core objectives of enterprises [10,[15][16][17]20]. Learning outcomes performance could provide information feedback based on the rationality of learning content and learning management of enterprises [4,[6][7][8].…”
Section: Criteria Framework For the Evaluation Of Enterprise Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are numerous examples of interesting empirical studies conducted in FTO related to the issues: positive organisational potential (Lis, 2013;Stankiewicz (Ed. ), 2013), absorptive capacity and organisational learning (Lis and Sudolska, 2015;Lis and Sudolska, 2017) or business relationships (Glińska-Neweś, Sudolska and Escher, 2016; Brzustewicz, Escher and Petrykowska, 2017).…”
Section: Context Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%