2013
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter- and Intra-Operator Variability in the Reading of Indirect Immunofluorescence Assays for the Serological Diagnosis of Scrub Typhus and Murine Typhus

Abstract: Inter- and intra-observer variation was examined among six microscopists who read 50 scrub typhus (ST) and murine typhus (MT) indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) immunoglobulin M (IgM) slides. Inter-observer agreement was moderate (κ = 0.45) for MT and fair (κ = 0.32) for ST, and was significantly correlated with experience (P = 0.03 and P = 0.004, respectively); κ-scores for intra-observer agreement between morning and afternoon readings (range = 0.35–0.86) were not correlated between years of experience … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Febrile controls, positive by LAMP but previously negative by R. typhi qPCR, were further evaluated by IFA, as described previously (27). These samples were from patients presenting at Mahosot Hospital with suspected typhus ( n = 67) and Salavan Provincial Hospital with fever ( n = 10) (6).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Febrile controls, positive by LAMP but previously negative by R. typhi qPCR, were further evaluated by IFA, as described previously (27). These samples were from patients presenting at Mahosot Hospital with suspected typhus ( n = 67) and Salavan Provincial Hospital with fever ( n = 10) (6).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IFA has additional limitations as this depends on the microscopist who reads the slides and determines the end-point titer. There might be inter-and intra-operator variability so microscopists must be supervised by more experienced laboratory professional and undergo several months of training before their results can be considered reliable [18]. Requirements of a trained personal, fluorescent microscope, validation of appropriate diagnostic cut offs and relatively high cost is the main drawback of the IFA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of E. chaffeensis infection with a twostep method has some disadvantages. Due to the low specificity of the peptide ELISA screening stage, confirmation is still reliant on IFA, a technique that requires extensive training to read and interpret test results and is dependent on the availability of a fluorescence microscope, requirements which are impractical in resource-limited regions (22). However, screening with peptide ELISA vastly reduces the workload of IFA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%