1973
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1973.33.3.783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale

Abstract: Video-taped interviews and mock ratings of typical cases were employed to evaluate raters' consistency of 37 raters (14 staff psychiatrists, 11 psychiatric residents, 10 clinical psychologists and interns, 2 nurses). Total score across time was most stable, single scale scores least consistent. Trends between professional groups were not large and not always related to degree of training, but psychologists rated typical patients more consistently, psychiatric residents showed greater across-time and inter-rate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Motor outcome parameters were the "cumulative daily off time" recorded by patients' diaries and the UPDRS. Patients also underwent psychiatric assessments by means of the Beck Depression Inventory [11] (BDI), the Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale [12] (MADRS) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale [13] (BPRS).…”
Section: Clinical Evaluation/data Analysis/statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor outcome parameters were the "cumulative daily off time" recorded by patients' diaries and the UPDRS. Patients also underwent psychiatric assessments by means of the Beck Depression Inventory [11] (BDI), the Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale [12] (MADRS) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale [13] (BPRS).…”
Section: Clinical Evaluation/data Analysis/statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anxiety was rated with the Beck anxiety inventory, 30 a self-rating assessment, with scores that range from 0 to 63 (high scores indicate more severe anxiety). The brief psychiatric rating scale 31 was used as a further psychiatric assessment of a wider range of symptoms, including psychosis (the total score of 18 clinician-rated items can range from 18 to 126, where high scores indicate poor mental health). Subscores of the brief psychiatric rating scale (anxiety and depression, anergia, thought disorders, activity, and hostility) were analysed separately.…”
Section: Dbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Other measures of outcome employed were the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) 17 and the Schedule for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). 18 Side effects were evaluated by the Simpson-Angus Scale for Extrapyramidal Symptoms (SAS), 19 the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) 20 and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS).…”
Section: Efficacy and Safety Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%