1980
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1980.tb00223.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter‐and intra‐specific effects of the mandibular gland secretion of larvae of the Indian‐meal moth, Plodia interpunctella

Abstract: The effects of the mandibular gland secretion of larvae of Plodia interpunctella (Hubner) on the behaviour of conspecific larvae and on its parasitoid, Nemeritis canescens (Gravenhorst) were studied in open chambers and in an olfactometer. The secretion is deposited in the form of droplets on the silk while it is being spun, and as irregular patches on the substratum. Plodia larvae presented with a choice between fresh food and food contaminated with mandibular gland secretion chose fresh food. Those provided… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Odor from H. virescens larvae did not trigger flight behavior of M. croceipes in wind tunnel and olfactometer studies (Eller et al, 1988;Rotheray, 1981), in contrast to the finding by Elzen et al (1987) that H. virescens larvae were attractive to the HeIiothis parasitoids, C. sonorensis and M. croceipes; Thorpe & Jones (1937), Monteith (1955), Mossadegh (1980), Nettles (1980), and the present study demonstrated host attraction to parasitoids.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Odor from H. virescens larvae did not trigger flight behavior of M. croceipes in wind tunnel and olfactometer studies (Eller et al, 1988;Rotheray, 1981), in contrast to the finding by Elzen et al (1987) that H. virescens larvae were attractive to the HeIiothis parasitoids, C. sonorensis and M. croceipes; Thorpe & Jones (1937), Monteith (1955), Mossadegh (1980), Nettles (1980), and the present study demonstrated host attraction to parasitoids.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…IMM larvae develop within, and compete for, the same resource, sometimes even cannibalizing each other ( Bjørnstad et al , 1998 ). Throughout their larval development, they produce a spacing pheromone that helps regulate colonization densities in the resource ( Mossadegh, 1980;Howard & Baker, 2004 ). IMM larvae may lack the physiological mechanisms to cease production of the spacing pheromone, and/or to produce and respond to aggregation pheromone in their final larval instar prior to pupation.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 98%
“…J., personal observation). Pre-wandering fifth-instar larvae repel each other by semiochemicals derived from droplets of mandibular gland excretions ( Mossadegh, 1980 ), providing evidence for pheromonal communication among pre-wandering larvae. Wandering-stage larvae have the same semiochemicals at a different ratio ( Howard & Baker, 2004 ) but the response to them has not yet been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 -5) The presence of two compounds in the glands of P. interpunctella with the molecular for-mulae of C24H4004 and C22H3S03 was concluded from high resolution mass spectrometry, and their structures were suggested to be 4-hydroxy-2-0Ieoylcyclohexane-1 ,3-dione and 2-palmitoylcyclohexane-I,3-dione (I) from their molecular formulae. 6 ) Two major kairomone components have also been detected in the feces of P. interpunctella larva, and structures were identified as compound I and 2-0Ieoylcyclohexane-1 ,3-dione. 7) In this study, the presence of 2-acylcyclohexane-I,3-dione homologues was surveyed in the feces of P. interpunctella, C. cautella and also in the rearing medium (rice bran).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%