2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter- and Intraexaminer Reliability in Identifying and Classifying Myofascial Trigger Points in Shoulder Muscles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps, this component, which implies the individualization of pain related to diverse personal aspects, could be the cause of the greater heterogeneity of triggering pain when a muscle contraction is requested. In other words, it seems to indicate that local pain is more easily detectable by muscle contraction than myofascial pain or myofascial pain with referral, as has also been reported for the identification and classification of myofascial trigger points by manual palpation in shoulder muscles, mainly in the symptomatic side of subacromial impact syndrome [ 34 ]. The current results also confirm those obtained in DC/TMD, whereas the sensitivity and specificity values for myofascial with referral pain were lower than those for myalgia, as previously stated, where the values for local myalgia and myofascial pain were not established [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Perhaps, this component, which implies the individualization of pain related to diverse personal aspects, could be the cause of the greater heterogeneity of triggering pain when a muscle contraction is requested. In other words, it seems to indicate that local pain is more easily detectable by muscle contraction than myofascial pain or myofascial pain with referral, as has also been reported for the identification and classification of myofascial trigger points by manual palpation in shoulder muscles, mainly in the symptomatic side of subacromial impact syndrome [ 34 ]. The current results also confirm those obtained in DC/TMD, whereas the sensitivity and specificity values for myofascial with referral pain were lower than those for myalgia, as previously stated, where the values for local myalgia and myofascial pain were not established [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Based on research, reproducibility depends on the examiner's experience, muscle depth, and active or latent TrP. Manual detection only differentiates affected muscle from healthy one and does not determine the exact location of TrP [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Some studies have investigated the morphological characteristics and hemodynamics of TrPs with the objective ultrasound tool and shown that this method can improve the accurate diagnosis and evaluation of TrPs [40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Clinical palpation has been used as the primary modality for diagnostic compression of muscular tissue; however, it is controversial due to poor study quality and variable reliability. [23][24][25][26] The complexity of integrating various diagnostic criteria into palpation is likely to produce inconsistent findings and hence reduce palpation's reliability for MTrP detection. 27 In addition, clinical palpation can only provide subjective reporting, such as the general location and estimated pain level in contrast to measurements of the exact location, size, depth, or shape of MTrPs within the muscle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%