2005
DOI: 10.1002/jps.20229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter‐ and intralaboratory variation of in vitro diffusion cell measurements: An international multicenter study using quasi‐standardized methods and materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…GlaxoSmithKline cells with steeper side arms showed slower dye dispersion within the 60.0±4. 6 22 For laboratories with CV less than 5%, 10% and 20% (12) side arm. Inadequate mixing in the side arm hinders receptor phase homogeneity yielding high variability when sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…GlaxoSmithKline cells with steeper side arms showed slower dye dispersion within the 60.0±4. 6 22 For laboratories with CV less than 5%, 10% and 20% (12) side arm. Inadequate mixing in the side arm hinders receptor phase homogeneity yielding high variability when sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 10-mg mass of finely ground potassium permanganate powder was gently deposited into each receptor cell. The times taken for the dye to spread uniformly throughout the main receptor cell chamber and sidearm at arbitrary low (1.5, 3), medium (5, 7), high (10,11) and very high (12,14) speeds were recorded.…”
Section: Stirrer Efficiency and Dye Spreading Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, that model was developed based on the Flynn database that contains human skin permeability results collected from many research groups using diverse experimental conditions. As it was shown in several studies [11][12][13], the difference between permeability data measured in various laboratories can exceed by an order of magnitude, therefore the prediction potential of this model is not proved yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%