2015
DOI: 10.1111/jsap.12411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter‐ and intraobserver agreement in interpretation of CT features of medial coronoid process disease

Abstract: General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms Clinical Significance: These findings suggest that subjective assessment of CT images is less reliable and repeatable than more quantitative methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agreement was poor for grading subchondral sclerosis, fair to moderate for medial coronoid abnormalities, and moderate for detection of osteophytes. 36 Those findings were similar to the findings of our study. In human elbows, the evaluation of elbow OA from MPRs has been shown to have good to excellent intraobserver and interobserver repeatability, and to be more repeatable than radiographic assessment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Agreement was poor for grading subchondral sclerosis, fair to moderate for medial coronoid abnormalities, and moderate for detection of osteophytes. 36 Those findings were similar to the findings of our study. In human elbows, the evaluation of elbow OA from MPRs has been shown to have good to excellent intraobserver and interobserver repeatability, and to be more repeatable than radiographic assessment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…13 Coronoid fragmentation and radioulnar fit are evaluated on transverseplane images, radioulnar and humeroradial fit are evaluated on sagittal-plane images, and radioulnar fit is evaluated on frontal-plane images. 35 In a study 36 in which 8 observers read 84 MPR views of the coronoid process twice, intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of evaluations of abnormalities of the medial coronoid process, osteophytes, and subchondral sclerosis ranged widely from poor to excellent, depending on the parameter evaluated. Agreement was poor for grading subchondral sclerosis, fair to moderate for medial coronoid abnormalities, and moderate for detection of osteophytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Its accessibility may also be limited in general practice, and in a recent study, inter-observer agreement to detect changes consistent with medial coronoid process disease was estimated fair to moderate, and poor for sclerosis grading. 26 As shown in this study, Campbell test has a good sensitivity. Thereby, the clinician usually has a strong clinical suspicion of medial coronoid process disease, but the disease can be in an early stage with only minor lesion on classic imaging techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Regardless of a variable sensitivity, radiographic examination is always the first choice for ED screening in practice [ 16 18 ]. However, due to both superimposition of the radial head over the medial coronoid process and osteophytes, a correct assessment of the MCP is not always possible [ 19 ]. Furthermore, a tight fit between the ulnar trochlear notch and the humeral condyle complicates the correct diagnosis [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%