2010
DOI: 10.1080/14649371003616045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter‐Asian banality and education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps not quite at the same scale, people doing reader-response studies were challenged about their uptake of the text-reader metaphor and its clear focus on interpretative activity as engaging in work that was too benign, or that was re-packaging gratifications research (Katz et al, 1973), that rapidly accumulating evidence of diversity and difference in interpretations was not really taking theory forward (e.g. Morris, 1988), that audience research in celebrating interpretative activity was celebrating limitless polysemy to the extent of ignoring textual power (e.g. Condit, 1989), that this wave, phrased as the 'new revisionism' by Curran (1990), was merely rediscovering things discovered earlier, that audience research tends to use concepts such as meaning and sense-making often without thinking about what is exactly meant by these terms (Dahlgren, 1998), or that this all neglected real issues of power (Corner, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps not quite at the same scale, people doing reader-response studies were challenged about their uptake of the text-reader metaphor and its clear focus on interpretative activity as engaging in work that was too benign, or that was re-packaging gratifications research (Katz et al, 1973), that rapidly accumulating evidence of diversity and difference in interpretations was not really taking theory forward (e.g. Morris, 1988), that audience research in celebrating interpretative activity was celebrating limitless polysemy to the extent of ignoring textual power (e.g. Condit, 1989), that this wave, phrased as the 'new revisionism' by Curran (1990), was merely rediscovering things discovered earlier, that audience research tends to use concepts such as meaning and sense-making often without thinking about what is exactly meant by these terms (Dahlgren, 1998), or that this all neglected real issues of power (Corner, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In May 2010 the journal Inter-Asia Cultural Studies launched a special issue commemorating its 10th anniversary. For Meaghan Morris (2010) it is not the journal’s achievements as a peer-reviewed publication that impress her most. Rather, she describes in detail the broad scope and multiple fronts and levels that the movement has covered over the decade, involving many people and institutions across Asia, compelling anyone seriously interested in cultural studies, Asian studies and the intimacies between them to take a closer look (see also Chen, 2010b).…”
Section: A Case Of Intimacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, Meaghan Morris's "Banality in Cultural Studies"[11] can be a significant reference for more analysis of the banality of these Hollywood movies in the sense that they forge a reality and amplify it to produce nonexistent phobias in the mind of Western audiences. This would justify the alleged western superiority over the so-called "abusers of women," the Arabs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%