2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2009.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-comparison of JEF-2.2 and JEFF-3.1 evaluated nuclear data through Monte Carlo analysis of VVER-1000 MOX Core Computational Benchmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two of the solutions are based on continuous energy Monte Carlo methods (MCNP4C (RSICC, 2000) and MCU (Kalugin et al, 2015)), while the other solution is based on collision probability (or similar) method (RADAR). Thilagam et al (2009) performed same calculations with different codes and Thilagam et al (2010) used benchmark results to perform inter comparison of evaluated data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the solutions are based on continuous energy Monte Carlo methods (MCNP4C (RSICC, 2000) and MCU (Kalugin et al, 2015)), while the other solution is based on collision probability (or similar) method (RADAR). Thilagam et al (2009) performed same calculations with different codes and Thilagam et al (2010) used benchmark results to perform inter comparison of evaluated data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%