2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-comparison of remote sensing platforms for height estimation of mango and avocado tree crowns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute height difference between these two datasets was 0.07 m -0.58 m. ALS may underestimate canopy height due to the lower point density and the larger footprint size in relation to canopy structure (Wu et al, 2020). To derive the maximum canopy height from ALS data, a laser beam has to hit the tree apex and the return of this laser beam has to be recorded by the scanner (Wu et al, 2020). Data acquisition parameters such as flying altitude and pulse density can affect the ability of height estimation from ALS data (Yu et al, 2012).…”
Section: Comparison Of Maximum Canopy Height From Terrestrial and Airmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The absolute height difference between these two datasets was 0.07 m -0.58 m. ALS may underestimate canopy height due to the lower point density and the larger footprint size in relation to canopy structure (Wu et al, 2020). To derive the maximum canopy height from ALS data, a laser beam has to hit the tree apex and the return of this laser beam has to be recorded by the scanner (Wu et al, 2020). Data acquisition parameters such as flying altitude and pulse density can affect the ability of height estimation from ALS data (Yu et al, 2012).…”
Section: Comparison Of Maximum Canopy Height From Terrestrial and Airmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…respectively, based on a calculation by the data provider of 120 ground control points. (Wu et al, 2018, Wu et al, 2020. To…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations