2017
DOI: 10.1080/22797254.2017.1352461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-comparison of SMOS and AMSR-E soil moisture products during flood years (2010–2011) over Pakistan

Abstract: Global soil moisture products retrieved from various remote sensing sensors are becoming readily available with a nearly daily temporal resolution. With lack of ground observations in Pakistan, microwave sensors are viable technologies for retrieving soil moisture from space. Thus, this study compares soil moisture data from Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) with Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) for 2010 and 2011, which were years where massive flooding occurred. We find suitable correlati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, both SMAP and SMOS operate on L‐band microwave radiometers (1–2 GHz), where the L‐band observation can penetrate to a deeper depth than other bands (e.g., X and C bands), which makes it more reliable for SM retrieval. The soil moisture retrieved from the SMOS and SMAP observations on a global scale is released freely to users, supporting many applications and associated soil moisture research (Anam et al, ; Shellito et al, ). In addition to the capabilities of these two satellite missions, there are many operational sensors (active and passive), which provide surface SM observations at C band and X band.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, both SMAP and SMOS operate on L‐band microwave radiometers (1–2 GHz), where the L‐band observation can penetrate to a deeper depth than other bands (e.g., X and C bands), which makes it more reliable for SM retrieval. The soil moisture retrieved from the SMOS and SMAP observations on a global scale is released freely to users, supporting many applications and associated soil moisture research (Anam et al, ; Shellito et al, ). In addition to the capabilities of these two satellite missions, there are many operational sensors (active and passive), which provide surface SM observations at C band and X band.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP, 1.41 GHz) and Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS, 1.4 GHz) are currently available satellites carrying L-band microwave radiometers. Global surface SM products retrieved from the observations of SMAP and SMOS have been released to the public, which have great value for related researches and applications (Anam, Chishtie, Ghuffar, Qazi, & Shahid, 2017;Shellito et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the validation of SMOS products is very important to determine the accuracy and the quality of retrievals before being used for different applications. Several recent studies have validated SMOS products in comparison to ground-based in situ observations at a global scale [24][25][26][27][28][29] and over local and regional scales such as Canada [30,31], the United States [32][33][34][35][36][37], Europe [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], Africa [42,45], and Australia [17,46], and some research has been carried out in Asia such as over the Tibetan Plateau [47,48], Pakistan [49], and China [50,51] that represents the accuracy and the quality of SMOS products. However, very few calibration and validation activities have been done for SMOS products in Iran.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%