1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0147-1767(98)00020-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-ethnic preferences and ethnic hierarchies in the former soviet union

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing evidence shows substantial consensus for hierarchies of social power (e.g., Barry & Kalin, 1979;Hagendoorn et al, 1998;Kahn et al, 2009). The present results extend the evidence for pervasive hierarchies to implicit social evaluation -who is good.…”
Section: Social Status = F(competence Warmth)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing evidence shows substantial consensus for hierarchies of social power (e.g., Barry & Kalin, 1979;Hagendoorn et al, 1998;Kahn et al, 2009). The present results extend the evidence for pervasive hierarchies to implicit social evaluation -who is good.…”
Section: Social Status = F(competence Warmth)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These attitudes have been studied with respect to both immigrants and to ethnocultural groups, with immigrants usually viewed less positively than those who were born and raised in Canada of the same cultural origin (see section below on immigrants). Similar hierarchies have been found in Europe (e.g., Hagendoorn et al, 1998;Van Oudenhoven et al, 1996) and in New Zealand (Ward, Masgoret & Leong, 2006). When the ethnic origin of the respondent is taken into account, a number of other features become apparent.…”
Section: Hierarchysupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The use of native languages was confined to only a very few domains and Russian became the only accepted language for educational and socioeconomic mobility, public institutions and media. Extreme Russification continued until the late 1980s when the disintegration of the Soviet Union and perestroika opened new possibilities for the native peoples who, according to Hagendoorn et al (1998), in spite of harsh assimilation policies, had managed to maintain a sense of belonging to their language, culture and identity. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the Republic of Altai reclaimed its autonomous status within the Russian Federation and started to develop new language policies that contributed to shaping the future of the Altai language.…”
Section: Altai: Land People and Languagementioning
confidence: 99%