Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Confer 2021
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-GPS: Interpretable Geometry Problem Solving with Formal Language and Symbolic Reasoning

Abstract: Geometry problem solving has attracted much attention in the NLP community recently. The task is challenging as it requires abstract problem understanding and symbolic reasoning with axiomatic knowledge. However, current datasets are either small in scale or not publicly available. Thus, we construct a new largescale benchmark, Geometry3K, consisting of 3,002 geometry problems with dense annotation in formal language. We further propose a novel geometry solving approach with formal language and symbolic reason… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geometry problem solving has been gaining more attention in the NLP community recently. Several geometry formal systems and datasets have been constructed, such as Geometry3K [29], GeoQA [6], GeometryQA [42]. Geometry3K translates the known conditions of geometric problems into formal statements, defining theorems as a set of rules for converting between formal statements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Geometry problem solving has been gaining more attention in the NLP community recently. Several geometry formal systems and datasets have been constructed, such as Geometry3K [29], GeoQA [6], GeometryQA [42]. Geometry3K translates the known conditions of geometric problems into formal statements, defining theorems as a set of rules for converting between formal statements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The symbolic approaches [18] parse the images and texts of geometric problems into a unified formal language description, and then apply a predefined set of theorems to solve the problems. These approaches require the establishment of a formal system and the problem-solving process has mathematical rigor and good readability.…”
Section: Apply Theorem Timentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For synthetic reasoning, geometric definitions and theorems are built inside machines, which then incorporate search techniques, often exhaustive, to find the solution [7]. Examples of the synthetic approach can be found in Inter-GPS [20] and GEOS [8], which are solvers with built-in Euclidean formulas. However, the algebraic approach has many limitations, and no geometric construction solver has adopted this method thus far.…”
Section: Computational Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For synthetic reasoning, geometric definitions and theorems are built inside machines, which then incorporate search techniques, often exhaustive, to find the solution [7]. Examples of the synthetic approach can be found in Inter-GPS [18] and GEOS [8], which are solvers with built-in Euclidean formulas. The algebraic approach involves algebraic operations such as Wenjun Wu's method [19] that decomposes problems based on the well-ordering principle and successive pseudo-reduction.…”
Section: Automated Geometric Reasoning With Formal Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%