2017
DOI: 10.1111/btp.12499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter‐group variability in seed dispersal by white‐handed gibbons in mosaic forest

Abstract: Seed dispersers, like white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar), can display wide inter-group variability in response to distribution and abundance of resources in their habitat. In different home ranges, they can modify their movement patterns along with the shape and scale of seed shadow produced. However, the effect of inter-group variability on the destination of dispersed seeds is still poorly explained. In this study, we evaluate how seed dispersal patterns of this arboreal territorial frugivore varies betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors observed that deciduous trees in this forest type often carry flowers or fruit sufficient to support low density gibbon populations. Future studies should examine whether northern white-cheeked gibbons maintain larger home ranges in less productive habitats as observed elsewhere for lar gibbons (Savini et al, 2008; Phiphatsuwannachai et al, 2017). A study of Nomascus gabriellae in Seima Biodiversity Conservation Area, Cambodia, found no significant differences in group densities across evergreen, semi-evergreen and deciduous forest, supporting the view that gibbons are more flexible than previously thought with regard to habitat usage (Rawson et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These authors observed that deciduous trees in this forest type often carry flowers or fruit sufficient to support low density gibbon populations. Future studies should examine whether northern white-cheeked gibbons maintain larger home ranges in less productive habitats as observed elsewhere for lar gibbons (Savini et al, 2008; Phiphatsuwannachai et al, 2017). A study of Nomascus gabriellae in Seima Biodiversity Conservation Area, Cambodia, found no significant differences in group densities across evergreen, semi-evergreen and deciduous forest, supporting the view that gibbons are more flexible than previously thought with regard to habitat usage (Rawson et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Although apparently suboptimal, the large continuous areas of deciduous forest could be adequate for gibbon persistence, as indicated by Phiphatsuwannachai et al (2017) for lar gibbons. These authors observed that deciduous trees in this forest type often carry flowers or fruit sufficient to support low density gibbon populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because we could not control the effect of foraging prior to our observations, gut retention times were not estimated for seeds defecated in the first two days of the data collection periods [46]. We discarded from the gut retention estimation all defecated seeds of which we were unable to determine the defecation time (e.g., found at the sleeping site) [30]. We used the same technique to estimate the cheek pouch retention times by recording the time of storing seeds and location of feeding tree.…”
Section: In Situ Retention Times and Dispersal Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining seed shadow generated by frugivores is difficult and requires considerable information. In fact, a realistic description of plant seed shadows needs to take into account seasonal resource availability, plant traits, as well as the disperser morphology, physiology, movement and behavior [12,[29][30][31]. The main objective of this study is to illustrate a modeling approach of simulated seed shadows which incorporates field-collected data and account for primates' movement patterns, feeding behavior and seasonal variations of resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%