“…The assumption has been that IHT of critically ill patients will result in improved outcomes, and that the risks and costs of transportation are outweighed by the benefits (1–3). The risk-benefit ratio appears to strongly favor transfer for some conditions, such as acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and trauma (4–11), but the ratio is less clear (and often remains to be studied) for many others (12, 13). IHT has been shown to cause delays in administering timely treatments for sepsis, and there is recent concern that IHT could be a vector for nosocomial pathogens(14, 15).…”