2011
DOI: 10.1108/00220411111105434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter‐indexer consistency in graphic materials indexing at the National Library of Wales

Abstract: Purpose -This paper seeks to report a project to investigate the degree of inter-indexer consistency in the assignment of controlled vocabulary topical subject index terms to identical graphical images by different indexers at the National Library of Wales (NLW). Design/methodology/approach -An experimental quantitative methodology was devised to investigate inter-indexer consistency. Additionally, the project investigated the relationship, if any, between indexing exhaustivity and consistency, and the relatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MeSH is an authoritative controlled vocabulary that is highly effective for bibliographic retrieval for systems that use it. However, studies and literature reviews on inter-indexer consistency often find variability and inconsistency, with consistency rates in the 20–40% range [ 25 – 27 ]. Our method takes this into consideration and, in part, addresses this problem to enhance term specificity by looking at how these terms posit in the subcategories within the thesaurus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MeSH is an authoritative controlled vocabulary that is highly effective for bibliographic retrieval for systems that use it. However, studies and literature reviews on inter-indexer consistency often find variability and inconsistency, with consistency rates in the 20–40% range [ 25 – 27 ]. Our method takes this into consideration and, in part, addresses this problem to enhance term specificity by looking at how these terms posit in the subcategories within the thesaurus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The problem with the proposition is that the evidence from formalised subject description and inter-indexer studies, of course only partly relevant for tagging and commenting, suggest the opposite. 21 The paradox of both tags and comments are that their rhizomatic nature means that at an aggregate level, when tags and comments are not used by a single individual or a single static close-knit community, they risk being simultaneously too generic and too specific over time.…”
Section: What Are Tags and Comments?mentioning
confidence: 99%