2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-individual variability of oscillatory responses to subject's own name. A single-subject analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to power spectra, the difference between motor-imagery and rest is obvious above central, parietal, and occipital regions in healthy participants, but with a high SD in the range of the -rhythm. This inter-individual difference in activation patterns is well in line with previous research involving simple stimuli such as an oddball [36], [37], subject's own name [38], [39], but also complex tasks such as music [40], and specifically motor imagery [15], [41], in which healthy participants show contradictory patterns of activation. As a consequence, visually exploring the pattern of coherences cannot specify whether a patient was performing the task or not.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…With respect to power spectra, the difference between motor-imagery and rest is obvious above central, parietal, and occipital regions in healthy participants, but with a high SD in the range of the -rhythm. This inter-individual difference in activation patterns is well in line with previous research involving simple stimuli such as an oddball [36], [37], subject's own name [38], [39], but also complex tasks such as music [40], and specifically motor imagery [15], [41], in which healthy participants show contradictory patterns of activation. As a consequence, visually exploring the pattern of coherences cannot specify whether a patient was performing the task or not.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Several studies have investigated changes in brain activity when healthy individuals [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] or comatose patients [11][12][13][14][15] are exposed to SON. However, to date, no such research has been reported for patients with SMID who experienced damage to the CNS perinatally or in childhood and survived at least 4 years after injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean and standard error bars of ERSPs at the Fz electrode for the 11 control subjects for (a) high theta(6)(7)(8) at 0-800 ms after stimulus onset and (b) high alpha (10-13 Hz) at 200-400 ms after stimulus onset. *** P < 0.001; NS, not significant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this investigation, we performed a group analysis and a single-subject analysis. Both analyses are important because results at the group level do not always reflect findings in the single subject (Kotchoubey et al, 2004; Holler et al, 2011) which are crucial for diagnosis in patients with DOC. Thus, we implemented two different preprocessing approaches: for group analysis, preprocessing steps included the following procedures: segmentation of the T1 image to compute the gray matter images; realignment to compensate for motion; unwarping (adjustment for movement-related artifacts); pre-coregistration of the functional images of session 2 to session 1; coregistration of the mean EPI to the participant’s gray matter image; normalization of an average image of the functional images with the segmentation parameters; data were spatially smoothed using a Gaussian Kernel of 8 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM); For single-subject statistical analysis, we did not perform normalization of the functional data to avoid artifacts induced by severe lesions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%